Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of the implicit scheme, Noteworthy is the con- <br />vergence problem of the implicit scheme (Smith and <br />Woolhiser, 1971), The fact that an implicit-difference <br />equation is unconditionally stable does not neces- <br />sarily guarantee a convergent solution. Convergence <br />of the numerical scheme depends on the form of the <br />equation, and on some parameters, which are func- <br />tions of the coefficients in the differential equation <br />and the mesh size in both time and space, <br /> <br />Mathematical Statement of the Problem <br /> <br />In the formulation of the mathematical model, <br />the following assumptions are made: <br /> <br />(1) A water system in the soil will be regarded <br />as a continuous medium. <br /> <br />(2) Soil will be treated as a semi.infinite, <br />homogeneous, isotropic porous body of stable struc- <br />ture. <br /> <br />(3) The flow of the water system is assumed to <br />be uoi-directional (Le., in the vertical or gravitational <br />direction only) and to obey Darcy's law, <br /> <br />(4) The physical properties of soil, such as <br />capillary tension, hydraulic conductivity, and mois- <br />ture diffusivity are unique, single-valued, continuous <br />functions of soil moisture content. ]n other words, <br />there is no hysteresis as long as only the wetting parts <br />of the relationships are considered. <br /> <br />(5) For simplicity, the initial moisture content <br />will be assumed uniform, Note that in reality the <br />initial moisture content is rarely uniformly dis- <br />tributed, <br /> <br />(6) Raindrops failing on the soil surface will be <br />treated as a continuous medium of water. <br /> <br />(7) Pore air pressure is assumed to remain <br />essentially atmospheric. <br /> <br />Based on the preceding assumptions, the mathe- <br />matical description of rain infiltratiOn is: <br /> <br />~Il. . .3__ (K(a) et1"J,) + 'K(a) <br />at az 3z az <br /> <br />(Richards Equation) <br /> <br />6(z.O) = eo <br /> <br />[K(a) 3~~') + K(a}]! <br /> <br />- r(t} <br /> <br />zoO <br /> <br />(O~ t S t ) <br />p <br /> <br />. , , , , , . (3) <br /> <br />~(O.t) - hIt) <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />(t ~ tp) <br /> <br />[K(a) 3t~a} + K(O}] \ z~'- - Ko <br /> <br />(5) <br /> <br />where {} = soil moisture content; t = time; z ~ vertical <br />coordinate positive upward; K( 8) = hydraulic conduc- <br />tivity; 1/.(8) = soil capillary potential; 80 = initial <br />moisture content; r(t) = rainfall intensity; t = time <br />of ponding; h(t) = depth of water ponding 011' the soil <br />surface (z = 0); and Ko = initial hydraulic <br />conductivity corresponding to the initial moisture <br />content, 80, Equation 5 is the "hypothetical" lower <br />boundary condition that is needed in order to solve <br />the problem, <br /> <br />At the time of ponding (t = tp.!, the soil <br />moisture content, 8 (z, t), just becomes saturated <br />(8 s)' In the mathematical expression, it is <br /> <br />a(O,r)-O <br />p s <br /> <br />, , , (6) <br /> <br />Equation 6 is a criterion used for the computation <br />of t p and is valid only if the air entry value of the soil <br />is zero. <br /> <br />The mathematical model consists of Eqs, 1 <br />through 6 and the 1/1<0)- and the K(8)-relationships of <br />the glven soil. Although the preceding set of equa- <br />tions, Eqs. I through 6, is formulated in one-space <br />dimension, z, only the rainfall intensity, r, and the <br />ponding depth, h, may vary independently, in addi- <br />tion to time, t, with another space-dimension, x, in <br />the direction of surface water flow if Eqs. 1 through <br />6 are coupled with a surface runoff model for the <br />surface runoff computation. <br /> <br />Before ponding, it is apparent from Eq, 3 that <br />the infiltration rate, f(t), is equal to the rainfall <br />intensity, r(t). However, rain infiltration can continue <br />indefinitely without ponding if r "Ks, where K is <br />the saturated hydraulic conductivity corresponding to <br />the moisture content at saturation, (J . Furthermore, <br />if r<I(", the total soil moisture ctntent may de- <br />crease, TIris does not sound logical, but can readily be <br />seen from <br /> <br />(I) <br /> <br />SO 30 <br />r(t.),. _CD at dz + Ko <br /> <br />.. . .. .. (7) <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />which was derived by integrating Eq, I with respect <br />to z from -~ to 0 and then having its results <br />substituted by Eq, 3 and the "hypothetical" lower <br />boundary condition, Eq. 5, Consequently, if r<1<o' <br />Eq, 7 yields <br /> <br />S.03O <br />-dz = <br />_,.,at <br /> <br />r - <br /> <br />K '0 <br />o <br /> <br />. ' , , , , , (8) <br /> <br />IS <br />