Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(~, <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />Co...M- ,..f' A'I'nls <br /> <br /> <br />2170 <br /> <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />080 ~ <br />THE COLORADO LAWYER <br /> <br />-' <br /> <br />October <br /> <br />U.S. 5~). 92 . .c.. 694.)J L. EtJ.2d 570 (19721: Iloo,.dnfR<,g,'n1H. /10,11. 40R U.S. 564. 92 S.C!. <br />270J. 33 L. .ld. l8 (J972}.S('(!(l!so UIlh'('nityo!C%rudo ~'. 5ih'am,,,,, 192 Colo. 75. 555 P.2d <br />1155 (1976). <br />Tho: judgment is. affirme-d. <br />Juuge RuIJI](.J and Judge Kdly con<,;ur. <br />. <br /> <br />I. Our disposition of this contention makes it unnecessary to address [he college's argument that <br />en;Jctment of the Fucwlty Due Process Act impliedly repealed provisions of the Teacher Tenure Act <br />relaring to junior cOlleges. <br /> <br />No. 79CAOl79 <br /> <br />Metro DOI,:hcrr. <br />PlaintifT~AppcIlee, <br />_--- -----.-.- V.- ..-:..--.-.----."""-~.., <br />/~""'city of Broumfield, 11 Municipal Corporation. .: <br />\... Defendant-Appell.lnl, ._,._...... <br />. -.- 'and .- ---.'-- <br />Empire Sal'ings Building & Loan As.liociation. A Corporation, <br />and Grcl'l1w,-y Park, Inc.. A Coloradu Corporation, <br />Defendants. <br />. <br />Augu'l 21. 1980 <br />Division III <br />Van Cisco Pierce and Berman. JJ. <br /> <br />Appeal from the District Coun of Jdferson Counly. Hon. Ronald J. Hanksl)', Judge. Judgment <br />uflimIcu. <br /> <br />Bcnja.min R. Loyc.....Whcoat Ridge, ColoraJo. for plai(ltiff.appeUI..'c. <br />Tallm<.ldgc, TalJlI1~ldge, W:Jllat:c &" Hahn. P.C.. David J. Hahn, Mauhcw D. Glasser. Denver, <br />Colorado, for dckndant-appcllam. <br /> <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,. <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Opinion by JUDGE VAN elSE. <br />Dcfcndant. City of Broomfield (lhe Cify) appeals a preliminary injunction prohibiling il from <br />allowing excess drainage wah:r gcner...lted in the Greenway Park Subdivision ro be collected in the <br />~(()nll dl.linagc system and then dcposih:d on the land of the pJainliff. Arklm Dochdf, We aflirm. <br />The mat.:rial t~C[:i arc l.lnJi~putcLl. PlainlitThas uwnt.-u and farmed his land since J923. Vnrill971. <br />tht: land to the W1;.':st was also farmed. l'arural cJrnina~ waS from rhe west in a sheer flow Q\.er <br />plaintiff's land, The up~r l:,uHlowncr constructed a berm :1ncJ it ditch paralJcf 10 his boundary fcn~e. <br />and, as a rc~ull of this. almosr no '...alr:r nuw~d nntu plaintiff's 1~lOd. <br />In 1971. rht: faml to rhe wesl ''''as suld [0 defendant Greenway P;Jrk, Inc. Thil; land ~came ran of the <br />city ;mtl wa..s pbued as the Gf~cnway P;lrk Subdivi,it)l) (Ihe: suhdivision). The slreers :lnd a\.enues in <br />the ~ubJivis.ion wen: dcdicared, and the ~it)' appn.wetJ the pl:n and lhe conveyance of rhe streets and <br />av("nucs '.subject ltHhe condition rhat the city s.hall unc1cn;tke m:Jintcnance {lhereof} onl): ::after <br />t.on~{rut:'(ion hJS been l."olllpkted by the ,ubJi\"i4ler and acccptro by the city." In 197..J. the im~ <br />pro..c:ment... having Cx:cn complc!cd in aCl.:urdJnl.:e with l.'it) ~[jnl.brds. the ,ity acct:"plcd fur mainte- <br />nance: the: curb~. gurr~r:s. sidewalk.<.. r;..t\'l=m~r. and ~torm dr.$ins loc:ttetl in th~ subdivision. <br />With the d~Ydopment of Ihe subJi\'i'lon anJ (he building or th)U~C'" [here. W.:lrer. in amounlS gre:ucr <br />than [he previous natufJ! now, gather~ in the streels. flu'AS along curb lines to slUnn drain inlets. <br /> <br />