Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Land Use <br /> <br />To estimate the percentage of impervious area in the DF A 0054 Basin, the various <br />land uses for present and future fully developed conditions were plotted from 1978 aerial <br />photography, current zoning maps and land use plans of the county and municipality <br />involved. Since the City of Thornton does not project any annexation east of Holly Street, <br />the Adams County Zoning Office indicated that it is unlikely development more dense <br />than the 2.5 acres per unit currently allowed by the Agricultural Zoning of this area would <br />occur. This assumption was therefore incorporated into the percent of impervious area <br />estimates. Percent of impervious area for each subarea was obtained by taking a <br />weighted average of the percent imperviousness of the different land uses in the subarea. <br /> <br />Subareas were determined from U.S.G.S. mapping and major basin features such as <br />the Colorado Agricultural Canal, Lower Clear Creek Canal, Riverdale Road, Holly Street, <br />and so forth. The future land use map is shown in Figure II-3. <br /> <br />Losses <br /> <br />A variable infiltration rate based on Horton's equation was assumed. For future <br />basin conditions, initial and final infiltration rates and the decay coefficient were based <br />on recommendations in the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District's User Manual - <br />CUHP Computer Profl,'ram. Initial and final infiltration rates under historic conditions <br />were estimated from U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service Soil Surveys for Adams County, <br />with minimum and maximum infiltration rates used to estimate final and initial <br />infiltration rates, respectively. A decay coefficient of .0018 per second was used for both <br />historic and future basin conditions. Maximum depression storage values were obtained <br />from the Urban Storm Drainafl,'e Criteria Manual. Uniform values of .4 and .1 inches were <br />used for pervious and impervious retention, respectively, under future conditions and .4 <br />and .05 inches under historic conditions. <br /> <br />Flood Hydrog'I'aphs <br /> <br />Selected flood hydrographs for the 100-year flood, future basin conditions, as <br />determined using the CUHP program are shown in Figures IIT-2 through IIT-4. For in- <br />formational purposes only, 100-year hydrographs for historical basin conditions are also <br />included at Holly Street and E. 112th Avenue on Figures IIT-3 and IIT-4, respectively. Peak <br />flood flows for the design storms considered in the study have been plotted against the <br />channel reference stationing in the Peak Flood Discharge Curves, Figures 1II-5, and 1II-6. <br />Detailed information on the hydrologic analysis is available at the office of the Urban <br />Drainage and Flood Control District. <br /> <br />III-2 <br />