Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />new conditions <br />new methodologies <br />comparison provided <br />compatible with previous flows <br />signi ficantly different stati stical.ly <br />confidence limits <br />90% confidence interval <br />50% confidence interval <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Diversion Characters: <br /> <br />does affect hydrology <br />does not affect hydrology <br />should not use stream data <br />from to <br /> <br />recor'ds <br /> <br />], <br /> <br />Previous Studies: <br /> <br />existing information <br />title 'f.IS. <br />title <br />title <br /> <br />)< <br /> <br />1'. <br /> <br />FINDING: <br /> <br />The hydrologic analysis _~ meets __ does not meet the mlnlmum <br />standards of _.......__ Rule 5,B. (detailed) or _..__ Rule 6,B. (approx.) <br /> <br />C, <br /> <br />Hydraulic Analysis <br /> <br />1, Water Surface <br />Profiles included: <br /> <br />-.-..-X- 10-year <br />=f 50-year <br />_....... lOo-year <br />500-year (optional) <br />_______ frequency-elevation table <br /> <br />X 100-year <br />-----~ 50o-year (optional) <br /> <br />2, Floodplain <br />Boundaries: <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Methodology: <br /> <br />'X <br /> <br />step backwater method <br />HEC-2 <br />other <br />alternative method <br />pub Ii shed manua I <br />assumed depth method <br />depth stated on maps <br />geomorphic features method <br />history flood method <br />rating curve method <br /> <br />a, <br /> <br />b, <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Delineation <br />PI"ocedures: <br /> <br />2_ <br /> <br />flood contour method etc. <br />map contour method etc. <br /> <br />-.8..... <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />__I <br />