Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COUlRt\110 RIVER STORAGf; PROJI<:CI' <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br /> <br />Ul.\/I <br /> <br />Glfln ConyOll <br />i"__ <br /> <br />IF/oqs,o" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Pmnoclfl PflO~ <br /> <br />[MflSO <br /> <br />\/f/70.' <br /> <br />transmission system <br /> <br />. Fonlfm.lI. <br /> <br />\\'YOMH\'G <br />Flominq GOf!l" <br /> <br />L'Yenfl <br /> <br /> <br />f> COLORADO <br />r AF"'o~(f'n <br />, F- I"Ri'll Lrun Mln. <br />Vemal Ronqfll A Blue Mno <br /> <br />MO:::':~?';' rc:co",~,~"fs"~o <br /> <br />.MidWOY <br /> <br />Shiproc~ <br /> <br />.\IE\\' MEX/CO <br /> <br />LEGEND <br />!' CRSP Deliury Poin' <br />.; CRSP Hydro Pion' <br /> <br />TrOnlmission Linu <br /> <br />power income <br />ncome from the sale~n~we~!Jn~S <br /> <br />iscal Yeart972 was $31.630.148. an in. <br />crease of $3.195.343 over that for Fiscal <br />Year 1971. Even though the runoff for <br />the 1971-72 water year was about 70 <br />percent of normal. generation at Glen <br />Canyon Power plant increased over the <br />previous year. primarily because of the <br />necessil}' to release sufficient water to <br />the lower Colorado River Basin to sat- <br />isfy the tOth year requirement of the <br />Colorado Rh'er Compact. Incmases in <br />generation at Flaming Gorge. Morrow <br />Point. and Fontenelle Powerplants. and <br />decreases at Bille Mesa were associated <br />with local variations in runoff. custom. <br />tlr load requiremllOts. and the availa. <br />bility of Morrow Point generators for the <br />full year. <br /> <br />TIll! Colorado River Storage Project <br />transmission system includes 1.812 cir. <br />euit miles of high voltage transmission <br />lines and 16 substations and switch. <br />yards with a total capacity of about <br />-I.ODO.OOO "VA, <br />