Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> CWCB FLOODPLAIN STUDY REVIEW <br /> Res. No. Cb-S32 <br />Hydraulics: <br />Item Note <br />No. Item Yes No N/A No: <br />HC-I Is the hydraulics method applicable to the channel? 0 0 Jll Ql <br />HC-2 Is the hydraulics method properly applied? 0 0 'ji[ <br />HC-3 Are the hydraulics input parameters generally correct? 0 0 ]it. <br />HC-4 Is the roughness coefficient applicable for the channel at <br /> the time of the study? 0 0 'R" <br />HC-5 Is the roughness coefficient applicable for the current <br /> channel? 0 0 )l <br />HC-6 Are there backwater effects on the floodplain that are not <br /> addressed in the hydraulics calculations? )!! 0 0 ~ <br />HC-7 Are there potential split flows upstream that may inundate <br /> more/different area than shown on the map? 0 j( 0 <br />HC-8 Are there potential backwater affects downstream that <br /> may inundate more/different area than shown on the map? 0 0 0 <br />HC-9 Is there evidence that the channel alignment has shifted <br /> since the study was performed? 0 0 0 <br />HC-lO Have river cross-sections been graphically plotted? 0 }Ill 0 <br />HC-ll Have water surface profiles been graphically plotted? 0 lit 0 <br />HC-12 Does hydraulic information for approximate streams meet <br /> requirements of rule 6.C? JI. 0 0 <br />HC-13 Does hydraulic information for detailed streams meet <br /> requirements of rule 5.C? 0 0 )II <br /> <br />Comments: <br />Note <br />No. <br />(I) <br />tz..) <br /> <br />Note <br /> <br />No I-!YbO Auc..ld PEFQ.f:"pM&'O. AS. P~'T OF i="I-\BM. <br />Cuc.....~"T.~ "NbEl2 12l>Ab.. MAV AFFSC-T PLOOnPLAlfoi. <br /> <br />CWCB3hecklist.doc <br /> <br />Page 5 of6 <br />