Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />III. <br /> <br />elevations for lIpper Bear Creek (Figure C). This demonstrates that our HEC-2 <br /> <br /> <br />model is working properly. The complete 'calibration' computer run and flood <br /> <br />profiles (FigurE' D) is provided in the Appendix. <br /> <br />Since the time the original hydraulics were completed, new, more detailed <br /> <br /> <br />mapping was deVIl loped for the study reach. This mapping is at a scale of l' <br /> <br /> <br />40' with a 1 foot contour interval. The new mapping indicates that <br /> <br /> <br />topography changes have occurred along the creek area. Therefore, a new <br /> <br /> <br />'existing' hydnulic analysis is necessary to define the floodplain as it <br /> <br /> <br />exists in its present condition. A HEC-2 analysis was completed using the <br /> <br />new topography in the study reach area. The 100-year and 500-year floodplain <br /> <br /> <br />are shown for the existing condition on Map Sheet 1 (in plan pocket). The <br /> <br /> <br />HEC-Z data is included in the Appendix. <br /> <br />A HEC-Z analysis was then completed using the proposed plan for construction <br /> <br /> <br />of the new library. Generally this plan includes removal of the brick and <br /> <br /> <br />stucco building (south end of the site) and construction of a new building <br /> <br /> <br />along the east end of the property. Regrading of the area is proposed for the <br /> <br />parking areas adj acent to the new buildings. The new 100-year and SOD-year <br /> <br /> <br />floodplains are shown for the proposed improvements on Map Sheet Z (in plan <br /> <br /> <br />pocket). The HEC-Z runs are included in the Appendix. <br /> <br /> <br />STUDY LIMITS <br /> <br />The downstream limits of the proposed improvements are approximately 1,000 <br /> <br /> <br />feet upstream of the confluence of Cub Creek and Little Cub Creek. The <br /> <br /> <br />hydraulic calculations start just downstream of this location at FIS Section <br /> <br /> <br />Q which is shown on the original FIS profiles (Figure E). <br /> <br />The upstream limits of the proposed improvements extend approximately 1,200 <br /> <br /> <br />feet south. Th,~ hydraulic calculations are extended to HEC-Z cross-section <br /> <br /> <br />118 which approximately equals FIS Section V (from the FIS profile). The new <br /> <br /> <br />flood profiles were drawn to show a tie into the existing FIS Section X <br /> <br /> <br />(Figure F). <br /> <br />Z <br />