Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Colorado IN&\1.. ("., Cnns..,r'vation Board <br />Flood Control and Floodplain Management Section <br /> <br />FI~IDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS FOR RULE 5 <br /> <br />Stream flames: <br /> <br />DETAILED' IIVFORMATION <br /> <br />~5fvt~~--~ <br /> <br />C(lmmunities: r,~~ u1> r.,~rf Co((<./iyw,a <br />Report title: h05J.,.-<t ~ <br />Report date: h(J./1A'~ tfrll6 0 <br />, <br />Engineer: (If different from title)_ ~ <br />Prior Designation No. (is any) _____ <br /> <br />L '--'-'--_..,- <br />?~ <br /> <br />?II":~...Q, -~ .. <br />. <br /> <br />Does the topographic base mapping meet the minimum <br />standards of Rule 5.A.7 <br /> <br />f.,/ <br />yes <br /> <br />-- no <br />-- no <br />--- no <br />_"H"_ no <br /> no <br /> no <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Does the hydrologic analyses meet the minimum <br />standards of Rule 5.B.7 <br /> <br />1,// <br />_____ yes <br /> <br />l'lav,e the effects of dams been taken into account <br />subject to the criteria of Rule 7 7 <br /> <br />~ <br />_____ yes <br /> <br />Does the hydraulic analysis meet the minimum standardV <br />of Rule 5.C. 7 _____ yes <br /> <br />Have the effects of levees been taken into account <br />subject to the criteria of Rule 8 7 <br /> <br />PI~S' <br /> <br />Does the published report and map meet the minimum <br />standards of Rule 5.0.7 <br /> <br />V:es <br /> <br />Was the information developed by a qualified individuaJ. ./' <br />meeting standards of Rule 5.E.7 ~yes <br /> <br />Reviewer's Comments: --d--" (J~ ~ <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION: <br />Reason for disapproval: <br /> <br />~' <br /> <br />Disapprove <br /> <br />Approve <br /> <br />Recommended by: <br /> <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />(- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br />no <br />