My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05261
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD05261
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:11:56 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:24:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
555
County
Adams
Denver
Community
Denver
Stream Name
Lower Box Elder Creek Watershed
Basin
South Platte
Title
FHAD - Lower Box Elder Creek Watershed
Date
9/1/2001
Prepared For
Denver, Adams County
Prepared By
Wright Water Engineers, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Flood Hazard Area Delineation <br />For Lower Box Elder Creek Watershed <br /> <br />so modeling the area necessitated splitting the channel into two distinct channels. The flow in the two <br />parallel channels commingles at certain cross sections and remains separate at other cross sectionsc <br /> <br />A floodway analysis was also completed for this project The floodways defined include the stream channel <br />and that portion of the adjacent land areas required to pass the lOO-year flood discharge without <br />cumulatively increasing the energy grade line at any point more than a designated amount above that of the <br />pre-floodway condition (FEMA, 1995). Two different floodway analyses were done. The computations <br />were done for maximum energy grade line increases of 0.5 and LO foot To the extent possible, the <br />floodway was determined using equal reduction of conveyance on opposite sides of the stream. <br /> <br />4.2 Results <br /> <br />The results of the modeling are presented in the following report appendices. Appendix P includes tabular <br />floodplain and floodway information for the 10-, 50-, 100- and 500-year recurrence interval storm events. <br />The floodplain delineation for the 100-year recurrence interval storm event is presented in Appendix Q. <br />The profile information for the 1O-year and 100-year storm events is presented in Appendix Rc Finally, <br />typical cross sections are presented in Appendix Sc <br /> <br />The floodplain of the main stem of Hayesmount Creek is generally wide (often over 2,000 feet) and shallow <br />(often less than three feet)c The floodplain is not usually bounded by defined channel banksc The floodway, <br />by contrast, is generally rather narrow (averaging less than 300 feet)c The main stem of Box Elder Creek is <br />often contained within a defined channel/over bank section that is generally about 1,000 feet wide and 10 or <br />more feet deep. The floodway is generally 400 feet wide or less. The floodplain of the Bear Gulch <br />tributaries is limited by narrow channels and relatively steep side slopesc Bear Gulch's main stem changes <br />from a narrow channel with steep side slopes at the upper end of the catchment to a broad floodplain area at <br />the downstream end of the catchment A summary of floodplain and floodway widths is presented in Table <br />4-L <br /> <br />TABLE 4-1 <br />Summary of Floodplain and Floodway Width <br /> <br /> Floodplain Width Floodway Width Floodway Width <br /> (O.S-foot EGL rise) (1.0-foot EGL rise) <br /> Ave. Min. Max. Ave. Min. Max. Ave. Min. Max. <br />Box Elder Main Stem 1,120 93 4,492 773 73 2,527 655 73 2,526 <br />Bear Gulch Main Stem 752 89 2,717 462 49 2,716 345 41 1,537 <br />Tributarv BGD 437 95 4,426 338 46 4,426 133 40 1,600 <br />Tributary BGE 138 46 257 71 40 113 53 40 84 <br />Tributary BGG 300 141 887 154 64 550 102 45 325 <br />Tributary BGH 251 150 699 106 50 292 70 40 160 <br />Tributary BGI 314 114 786 137 42 345 90 40 225 <br />Tributary BGJ 524 160 924 212 71 484 171 54 484 <br />Hayesmount Creek Main Stem 994 182 3,377 374 65 1,315 235 43 929 <br />Tributarv HCF 994 185 1,966 439 68 1,272 302 61 600 <br />Tributarv HCX 828 117 2,320 236 22 815 133 22 319 <br /> <br />5.0 REFERENCES <br /> <br />Adams County. 1989. Storm Drainage and Technical Criteria. <br /> <br />AzTec Consultants, Inc. 1998a. Aerial Control and Permanent Monuments, Lower Box Elder Creek <br />Mapping, December 18, 1998. Prepared for the Urban Drainage & Flood Control District <br /> <br />AzTec Consultants, Inc. 1998. Bridge/Culvert Geometry, Lower Box Elder Creek Mapping, December 18, <br />1998. Prepared for the Urban Drainage & Flood Control District <br /> <br />Balloffet & Associates, Inc., Clarion Associatesc 1999. Adams County Comprehensive Plan January 1999. <br />Prepared for Adams County Planning and Development Department. <br /> <br />Boyle Engineering Corporationc 1985c Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure Computer Program-PC <br />Version (CUHPEIPCJ Prepared for Urban Drainage and Flood Control District <br /> <br />Boyle Engineering Corporationc 1985. UDSWM/PC Version. <br /> <br />Central Colorado Water Conservancy District 1987. Box Elder Creek Rehabilitation Program Bootleg, <br />Klug, and Ireland #5 Reservoirs, Weld and Adams Counties, Coloradoc <br /> <br />CH2M-Hill. March 1994c Hydrology Report. Prepared for Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, <br />City of Aurora, Arapahoe County and Adams County. <br /> <br />CH2M-HiI1. 1994. Upper Box Elder Creek Outfall Systems Planning Study Hydrology Report. <br /> <br />CH2M-Hill. December 1995c Flood Hazard Area Delineation, Coyote Run and Upper Box Elder Creek. <br />Prepared for Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, City of Aurora, Arapahoe County, and Adams <br />County. <br /> <br />991-134.000 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />Wright Water Engineers, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.