Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />HYDROLOOIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Listed in Table 2 are discharges for the return intervals examined in this <br />study for Parachute Creek and the Colorado River. No further hydrologic <br />investigations were performed for this report. <br /> <br />TABLE 2 <br /> <br />FLCXJD DISCHARGES <br />(cubic feet per second) <br /> <br />Location <br /> <br />10-year <br /> <br />50-year <br /> <br />100-year <br /> <br />500-year <br /> <br />Colorado River <br />Parachute Creek <br /> <br />31,200 <br />2,350 <br /> <br />40,400 <br />4,400 <br /> <br />44,400 <br />5,600 <br /> <br />50,100 <br />10,000 <br /> <br />Source: ref. 1 and 2 <br /> <br />Peak discharges for Parachute Creek developed by the Soil Conservation <br />Service are derived partially with the use of the SCS TR-20 computer program <br />which simulates rainfall flood peaks. Output from the program for 16 different <br />watersheds tributary to the Colorado River between DeBeque and Glenwood Springs <br />were plotted and a regional curve of drainage area versus peak discharge and <br />return frequency was developed. Regional curves were also drawn for snowmelt <br />flood events derived from stream gage data from 8 gages in the area. The <br />simulated rainfall curves and the snowmelt curves were then combined using a <br />standard probability equation into one set of curves which was applied to <br />several tributaries in the area, including Parachute Creek. <br /> <br />Regional stream gage analyses were used by the Corps of Engineers to derive <br />flood discharges for the indicated return frequencies for the Colorado River as <br />well. Data from eight gages on the Colorado River, the Roaring Fork River and <br />Plateau Creek were used without differentiating between rainfall and snowmelt <br /> <br />8 <br />