Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.C:\'- 8'1' U'A'- <br />1'_1',1.., .".t:i \.J=:'; <br /> <br />402 221 7164; <br /> <br />AUG-4-03 19:00; <br /> <br />Pt\GE 4/4 <br /> <br />- 2- <br /> <br />Upon completion of the non-federal Cherry Creek PMP Technical Review by the eWeB <br />and local sponsors. what is the next step? During the open discussions at the June 19" <br />meeting, the committee members presented a number of requests/options for moving the <br />project forward. Please consider the following requests/options and reply to the eWeB, <br /> <br />Currently the proposed requests/options are: <br /> <br />. REQUEST NO.1 - Can the Corps use the AWA PMP values and the Corps' 1995 PMF <br />madel, the Corps will compute the PMF storage pool volume and compare the value to <br />the existing reservoir space and Corps' 1995 storage volume that presently has a <br />requirement for an additional 100,000 Acre-Foot of storage space to the existing <br />reservoir pool? <br />. REQUEST NO.2 - Should the Corps not have the resources to perform REQUEST NO, <br />1, can the Corps provide its 1995 PMF Model to the eWCB so a non-federal PMF <br />lIolume determination can be computed using the Corps procedures and All/A's PMP <br />input parameters? <br />. REQUEST NO.3-Is there an opportun~y to revise the Corps' dam safety operational <br />requirements regarding storage and spill schedules for the Cherry Creek Dam and <br />Reservoir? <br />. REQUEST NO.4 - Should the Corps not have the resources to address REQUESTS 1- <br />3; Can the Corps partner with the CWCB and the NWS in a joint request to the National <br />Academy of Science for the resolution and determination of reasonable PMP values for <br />the Cherry Creek Basin using the findings in the NWS 1 995 PMP Study and the AWA <br />2003 PMP Study? <br /> <br />The resolution of the proposed need for additional PMF storage issue for Cherry Creek Dam <br />and Reservoir in Denver. Colorado is important one to the State of Colorado, the sponsoring <br />communities and the Corps of Engineers. When the Corps has formulated a position and <br />response regarding this formal request. please provide me your cursory comments. Please also <br />provide approximate meeting dates so I can schedule a project review meeting with the <br />sponsoring communities working group called the Project Advisory Committee, I welcome the <br />Corps' involvement in the CWCB technical review ofthe Cherry Creek PMP and PMF Studies. <br />I await your response - Thank You! <br />/' <br />7incere . .' <br /> <br />/~ <br />.'~7 <br />~VJ. <br />./;:arry ~n9 <br />Proj~t Manager <br /> <br />cc. Sponsor Communitief; <br />Arapahoe County <br />Douglas County <br />City of Aurora <br />City of Greenwood Village <br />Applied Weather Associates &. Project file <br /> <br />rJood pfl]le~lion. Woller Frojc't Planning. Ilnd riMllcini,- S'f~am J.ml L.lkt flratc:C1.10n <br />WalcrSupply Protection. ConSCN:J.ticn Plannmg <br />