Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />REAL FSTATE SECTION <br /> <br />The Real Estate inkrest used for this study was fee title for the diversion <br />channel with a 15-foot-widc temporary work area easement running along each side <br />the proposed channel. The proposed tOO-year diversion channel will require the <br />acquisition of 35.17 acres of fee title and 3.21 acres of temporary work area <br />easements. The diversion channel alignment runs through. four different lOnings and <br />will affect 18 landowners. The wnings within the corridor and the acreages within <br />each zone are commercial (3.16 acres of fee title and 1.82 acres of casements), <br />industrial (3.77acres olfee title), residential (12.2Sacres of fee title and O.67acres <br />of easements) and agricultural (15.99 acres of fee title and 0.72 acres of easements). <br />There is only one residential dwelling that will require relocation beneflts under <br />Public Law 91-646 for both the I()().year and 3D-year diversion channel plan. The <br />total estimated Real Estate cost for the tOO-year diversion channel project is <br />$463,201. Real Estate cost estimate and typical fee title and temporary work area <br />easement agreements are presented in Appendix D. <br /> <br />The proposed JO..year diversion channel will require the acquisition of 29.02 <br />acres of fee title and the total estimated Real Estate cost is S360,000. <br /> <br />The alignment for the IOO-year and 3o-yea.r diversion cl1annels are virtually the <br />same, with only the width varyin/!:. <br /> <br />No acreage or value has been included for a dump site for wasting e~ccss <br />e~cav~tion material. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />6-, <br /> <br />'0- <br /> <br />_u <br /> <br /> <br />./ <br /> <br />fl.OODlNG IMPACTS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />With the l()().yearpJan in place, Dry Creek dischargeS would be significantly <br />m:luccd from Uuimcr and Weld Canal to it's confluence with the Cache La Poudre <br />River. Tahie 6-1 shows a comparison of discharges for existing conditions and with <br />diversion of flows. The water surface profiles for Dry Creek also reflect a reduction <br />in stage from Uuimer and Weld Canal downstream to the mouth for the with- <br />diversion channcl COIldition. Plates 9 and 10 show the nood profiles for uisting <br />conditions with the lOO-)'ear channel diversion and plates 11 and 12 show the <br />without-channel diversion, beginning at the mouth and ending at Larimer and Weld <br />Canal. <br />To determine the effocts of floods greater than !he lOO-yearevent on the 100- <br />year plan, the splil.flow option was utifu.ed to determine the amount of discharge <br />that would pass over the diversion weir and into Larimer and Weld Canal during a <br />5oo-)'ear event. II was determined that approximately 1,550e.f.s. of the 9,420 c.f.s. <br />500-year discharge would pass over the weir and into Larimer and Weld Canal, while <br />7,870e.f.s. would pas~ down the diversion channel. It was assumed that the 1,550 <br />c.f.s. ovcrflow from the SOO-year evcnt would breach Larimer and Weld Canal and <br />now downstream. Thcre would be little induced flooding from the Soo.year event <br />along the diversion channel downstream from Willox Lane because thc majority of <br />the flow would be contained within thc channel or frcel>oard wne. The profiles alson <br />show that the ]OO-yt'<tf c:h~nn..l (\;vf:'r~i(lf! rrofl!e~ WQ'21<! ~~V:rb: wi:..': :'':c cx::~:;r.g <br /> <br />Dry Creek profiles about ISoo feel upstream from the location where Dry Creek <br />flows would eflter the diversion channel. <br /> <br />With the IOO-yearchannel diversion plan, the residual flood damages from Dry <br />Creek between J..ar:mcr and Weld Canal and CoUcge Avenue could be reduced or <br />eliminaled throu~h localized channel improvements. ineluding channd d.."nnlll atId <br /> <br />6-6 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />