Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />insur.rnce program. It is not known how many of the insured structures are locatel;l <br />within the Dry Creek flood plain. <br /> <br />STRUCTIJRAL MEASURES <br /> <br />To the extent that l!. strUcwraJ alternative would not necessarily remove all <br />structures from the tOO-year flood hazard area, flood insurance could be a <br />component ofa structural plan. <br /> <br />Several structural measures were (:(Insidered to reduce ~r eliminate the flooding <br />in Fon Collins from Dry Creek. As discussed earlier in this repon, the study area <br />was divided into three reaches to be consistent with the Ciry's drainagcway plan. <br />The formulation of structural measures was tailored to address those areas <br />e;l;perieneing the greatest flood damage while minimizing the environmental impacts. <br />Structural measures considered were a diversion channel and channel improvements. <br />Dams were not evalualed as pan ofthjsreconnaissance studybee.ause the physical <br />topography io the Fon Collins area is flat, and there were no apparent cost-effective <br />locations for dams. Levees were not considered because of the close proximity of the <br />channel to residential and commercial buildings and because the uistingchannel in <br />some areas has been oblilerated by development and would require construction or <br />a new channel. <br /> <br />The use of flood insurance to provide protection against financial losses caused <br />by flooding will increase in the future. There are two primary reasons that this will <br />occur. First, flood insurance is required by most lending institutions on structures <br />used as collateral which are located in the lOO-year flood plain. As property is sold <br />and financed over time, an increased number of structures will be insured. SOCOlIdly, <br />as property owners become aware of the threat of flooding, they are more J.ikely to <br />purchase flood insurance. In the cvent a serious flood occurs, a large increase in the <br />number of insured structures is probable. <br /> <br />PLAN FORMULAll0~ AJ\1> ALTER..l'o;ATIVE PLANS <br /> <br />FWOD PLAIN ZONTh"G <br />The City of Fort Collins and Larimer County have adopted land use regulations <br />restricting development in the ]oa.year flood plain and in the designated floodway. <br />These regulations require that ncw structures placed in the flood plain be prote(:ted <br />by flood proofing or elevation from polential damage hya loa-year flood even!. In <br />the ease of the floodway, the developer must also cnsure thaI duo: development will <br />not increase lQO.-year flood depthS beyond acttptable f100dway limits. <br /> <br />Plan formulation efforts for this reconnaissance study proceeded through the <br />following three phases: review of previous sponsor identified alternatives, formulation <br />and analysis of alternatives during the initial reconnaissance study, and funher <br />analysis of the desired alternative during the reconnaissance SlUdycxtension efforts. <br />TheSt' efforts will be summarized. <br /> <br />Continued flood plain regulation is required in conjunction with the FEMA <br />flood insurance program. These regulations will limit increases in future flex>d <br />damages but will not greatly reduce the existing flood problem. <br /> <br />Thc Dry Crcck Dr.llnageway Plan, prepared for the City of Fon Collins in <br />January 19S0byGingery Associates,lne.,identified the fOllowing four economically <br />feasible alternatives: <br />. Channel improvements, including a channel bypass around Alta Vista, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />s-s <br /> <br />H <br /> <br />. <br />