|
<br />-
<br />
<br />. 1lhese percentages were used for all flood .
<br />darnagestoouildingsandtheireontents.
<br /> Table 4-5
<br /> events examined. Table 4-5 shows the estimaled damages in the 3 study reaches and Elcistillg CortdjtiQns Damagas
<br /> 1990 Values
<br /> the 17 subareas forvarlous flood events, and the estimated "",,'" damages (EAD)
<br /> for each of the reaches and subareas and a total EAD for the sludyarea of$658,700. FJQodEvenls
<br /> -""" ..". l().Y.ar 5Q..V... ,QO.V.., ~Y.., -'"
<br /> Ruehe
<br /> Sub....
<br /> , 0 , 0 , 1.'00 S11,.ooo , ",., , ~9,~OO , .=
<br /> , 0 0 0 86,500 26.l.TOO ~56,200 MOO
<br /> , '2.<00 ~7.f1OO 362,500 1.872,200 2.406,&10 3.134,400 1~,$OO
<br /> . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
<br /> , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
<br /> Suo'o..1 12.400 .?roo 3llJ,1SOO 1,r.,e,IOO 2.e...,8OO 4.139,800 165.100
<br /> R..<~ a
<br /> Suo"o.
<br /> , 0 0 &016.900 ,,2(lI.700 1.373.100 1,se9,SOO 114,200
<br /> , 0 0 ,suoo 523.700 792,400 1.634,200 42,400
<br /> , 0 0 'S3.400 503.800 876,800 l.o.o9,~ 3'3,800
<br /> . 0 0 171.lSOO ~s.eoo 7'S,!\OO 1,072,900 ",~
<br /> " 0 0 0 23.800 40,'00 65,&00 1,200
<br /> " 0 0 100.200 143.100 \16,100 2$,500 u,:roo
<br /> " 0 0 ,.~ ,.~ ,= ,= '00
<br /> " 0 0 -.~ 1.771,1100 1~75,&OO 2,439,200 153,800
<br /> Sublolll' 0 0 2.125.500 ..n7.500 5.782,100 8,1",400 -407,500
<br /> II..,,,,,
<br /> s...",.
<br /> .. 0 0 0 21.100 32"'00 82,000 ~
<br /> " 0 0 3-17.700 55\,200 708,600 ~','OO 62,'00
<br /> " 0 0 43.600 l11.llOO \32,700 14O,roo lC.:100
<br /> " 0 0 ~.= 128.200 '38,900 '51.000 '2,800
<br /> Sub"'''' 0 0 ~,., 8'3.'00 t.012.roJ 1,:ue,000 86,000
<br /> T..., 12,400 41.roJ 2.g3~.'00 7.491.000 9..&e9,roJ lJ,5\lIl.loo 6!>e.700
<br />. 4-19 4-20 .
<br />
|