My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05184
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD05184
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:48:32 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:18:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Boulder
Community
Boulder County
Stream Name
Lower Boulder Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood Hazard Area Delineation
Date
3/1/1983
Prepared For
Boulder County
Prepared By
UDFCD
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Loss rate information for the hydrologic model was based upon infiltrometer <br />studies by the U.S. Forest Service in forest areas, mixed forest and grassland <br />areas, and grassland areas for mountain terrain in the South Platte River <br />basin over a period of years. The results of these studies showed average <br />infiltration rates of about 50% of infiltrometer studies for plains area. <br />Based upon these studies, an infiltration rate of I-inch per hour was <br />selected for the Boulder Creek basin. <br /> <br />were also supplemented with cross sections taken from this mapping as needed. <br />All bridge cross sections were obtained from actual field measurements. <br /> <br />The determination of water surface profiles and flood boundaries was especially <br />complicated along portions of Boulder Creek because of the extensive modifi- <br />cation of the floodplain due to gravel mining operations. These operations have <br />resulted in a floodplain typified by dikes and ponds of irregular shape and <br />size. Because the integrity of these diking systems is unknown when subjected <br />to floodwaters, the most conservative analysis was utilized. This consisted <br />of assuming the diking system was intact for computation of flood water surface <br />elevations. <br /> <br />The results of the hydrologic analysis are presented graphically in Figure 3 - <br />Discharge Probability Profiles. <br /> <br />Hydraulic Analysis <br /> <br />Water surface elevations for the 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year floods were <br />computed using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers step-backwater computer <br />program HEC-2 (Reference 3). The version used was the HEC-2 release dated <br />November, 1976, updated August, 1977, error correction 01, 02, modifications <br />50, 51, 52, and 53. No high water marks were located from which to calibrate <br />the hydraulic model on Boulder Creek. Stream gaging data collected at the U.S. <br />Geological Survey stream gage on Boulder Creek upstream from the mouth were <br />used to compare results from the hydraulic model. Manning's "n" value of 0.040 <br />was used in the channel for Boulder Creek. Overbank "n" values range from 0.070 <br />to 0.150. Adjustments were necessary in the hydraulic model for overbank rough- <br />ness and geometry due to the extensive use of the floodplains for gravel <br />mlnlng. Starting water surface elevations for Boulder Creek were established <br />from stage-discharge relationships developed for St. Vrain Creek. Bridges in <br />this study were analyzed in accordance with the U.S. Department of Transpor- <br />tation/Federal Highway Administration's publication entitled, "Hydraulics of <br />Bridge Waterways" (Reference 10). <br /> <br />Cross section data for Boulder Creek was obtained photogrammetrically by <br />digitizing sections marked on the aerial photography of the stream and flood- <br />plain. These sections were taken from the same photography flown for the <br />topographic mapping used in this study (Reference 1). The digitized sections <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.