My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05175
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD05175
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:48:30 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:18:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Summit
Community
Breckenridge
Stream Name
Blue River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Technical Addendum Floodplain Information Blue River
Date
12/1/1974
Prepared For
Summit County
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />- 4 - <br /> <br />in the Breckenridge area. One station, Hoosier Pass, is located <br />on the Continental Divide south of town. Two other stations are <br />located at different elevations down through the basin. A U.S.G.S. <br />continuous recording gage is located on the Blue River below the <br />town. <br /> <br />A review and correlation of the precipitation gages with streamflow <br />records gave an indication as to the type of hydrology that existed <br />in the area. For example, shown in Table 1 are the dates of peak <br />discharges on the Blue River and the amounts of precipitation that <br />occurred on that day and three days preceding the date of peak <br />discharge for the period 1951 through 1972. From the table it <br />could be seen for the most part that very little relationship <br />exists between the peak discharge and the amount of rain that <br />fell in the basin. This relationship suggests two things: the <br />storms that caused the events are of small areal distribution or <br />the flood peaks were due almost entirely to snowmelt runoff. <br /> <br />To duplicate the type of storm that is most likely to occur and <br />cause a flooding event, it was necessary to have an understanding <br />of meteorological factors that govern the occurrence of storms. <br />Accordingly, a series of reports on the climatology of the Blue <br />River Basin was prepared by Mr. G. V. Mulvey of Colorado State <br />University Department of Atmospheric Sciences. In his reports, <br />Mr. Mulvey describes the rainfall producing events for the la-year, <br />25-year, IRF and SPF. These reports are shown in Appendix A and <br />were used in the computer model to synthetically derive flood <br />flows. <br /> <br />The relationship between snow course data collected at Hoosier Pass <br />. and peak discharge in the Blue River basin recorded at the U.S.G.S. <br />recording gage helped define the dependence of peak flows on snow- <br />melt. Figure 1 shows the relationship between snow course data <br />and peak discharge. A statistical analysis was run on the two <br />sets of data and a regression coefficient of 0.88 was found to <br />exist. The equation defining the relationship is also shown on <br />the Figure. Similar type investigations were made for the lower <br />snow course stations; however, lower regression coefficients were <br />found to exist. This indicates that the peak discharge on the <br />Blue River occurs primarily when the upper basin is contributing <br />snowmelt and most of the snowmelt in the lower basin is gone. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />~ Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers. Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.