Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.1" <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />- 15 - <br /> <br />Using the design flows in Table 4 discharge-frequency curves <br />were prepared for each design point. These are shown in Figures <br />3 through 9. <br /> <br />EFFECTS OF DEVELOPMENT ON RUNOFF <br /> <br />Development, unless properly engineered, can increase runoff <br />significantly. This is particularly true in the eastern plains <br />of Colorado where estimates of increased runoff range from three <br />to tenfold over historic runoff. However, the effects from a <br />mountain type development would not be as great as the effects <br />from a development in the eastern plains. Most developments in <br />the mountains retain a natural setting including most of the <br />vegetative cover. Runoff from this environment would not be in- <br />creased significantly. Another important factor is that the <br />maximum Blue River flood producing storms for the town of Brecken- <br />ridge were found to occur above the town. Continued development <br />within Breckenridge and adjacent to the town will increase runoff <br />if a storm is centered over that particular area. However, if <br />a storm is located close to Breckenridge, then flows in the Blue <br />River through the town will be less than if the same event were <br />located above the town. Increased runoff from the development <br />will have very little affect on the design floods of the Blue <br />River through the town of Breckenridge. Runoff from developments <br />is more of an internal drainage problem, although increased runoff <br />can be expected. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />C\) <br /> <br />Leonard Rice Consulting Waler Engineers. Inc. <br />