Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..~~ <br /> <br />~_.", .=lIIiIiIti.lII-J"""ilt-~1 <br /> <br />-.miiIiilIiii""......,&'~,',",;,'; <br /> <br />MANUAL FOR ESTIMATING FLOOD CHARACTERISTICS <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Annual peak discharges through September 30, 1973, for each 9a~ing sta- <br />tion used in this study were fitted to the log-Pearson Type I I I distribution. <br />A subjective appraisal of high and low outl iers was made based on tre rea- <br />sonableness of the computed flood-frequency curves. High outliers cause <br />frequency curves to estimate extremely large flood discharges, especially for <br />the larger recurrence intervals, through an increased standard deviation and <br />large positive skewness. Low out! iers cause large negative skew"ess but in- <br />crease the standard deviation of the frequency distribution. To 5or,e degree, <br />these characteristics are compensating, but extreme negative skewness can <br />produce flood-frequency relations which estimate little or no increase in <br />discharges with increases in recurrence intervals. The outl iers ......'ere el im- <br />inated, where warranted, and the flood characteristics were recomputed based <br />on the remaining annual peak discharges. The gaging stations where outl iers <br />were el iminated are footnoted in tables S-B. <br /> <br />The computed peak discharges for the 10-, 50-, 100-, and SOD-year recur- <br />rence-interval floods for each gaging station used in this analysis are <br />listed in tables 5-B. <br /> <br />COMPUTATION OF FLOOD DEPTHS <br /> <br />Depths for the 10-, 50-, 100-, and SOO-yea r floods we re computed for <br />223 gaging stations in Colorado and adjacent States. Some of the stations <br />used in the discharge analysis were not used in the depth analysis because of <br />difficulties in obtaining stage-discharge relations or because of suspected <br />inaccuracies in extending some stage-discharge relations to cover extremely <br />large. flood discharges. <br /> <br />:~ <br /> <br />The most recent stage-discharge relation for each station (usually <br />through September 30, 1973) was used as the base relation, with previous <br />relations being used where applicable to extend the base relation both up- <br />ward and downward. Many of the relations required long extensions in order <br />to cover the range in discharge. Straight-line extensions on log-log graph <br />paper were made except where other information, such as bankfull stage, <br />indicated curvature. <br /> <br />The depth computations consisted of picking a stage for the 10-, 50-, <br />100-, and 500-year discharges from the stage-discharge relation. Next, the <br />stage of the point of zero flow was obtained from the relation and subtracted <br />from the stage of the flood discharge. Selection of the point of zero flow <br />is illustrated in figure 12. The computed depths for the 100-year flood are <br />listed in tables 5-8. <br />