Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL <br /> <br />RUNOFF <br /> <br />study and subbasins in the study area. A field check and possibly field . <br />surveys should be made for each basin. At this stage of planning, the <br />possibility of the diversion of transbasin waters should be investigated. <br />Transbasin diversions out of the study area should also be kept in mind. <br />The engi neer shoul d be very cauti ous when reduci ng a des i gn flow due to a <br />transbasin export, particularly for the major storm analysis. See Colorado <br />Drainage Law in this manual for comments on liability concerning transbasin <br />waters. <br />The major storm drainage basin does not always coincide with the minor <br />storm drainage basin. This is often the case in urban areas where a low flow <br />will stay next to a curb and follow the lowest grade, but when a large flow <br />occurs the water will be deep enough so that part of the water will overflow <br />street crowns and flow into a new subbasin. <br />For an example of how to apply the Rational Method refer to the STORM <br />SEWER part of this manual. <br /> <br />3.8 Major Storm Analysis <br />When analyzing the major runoff occurring on an area that has a storm <br />sewer system sized for the initial storm, care must be used when applying the <br />Rational Method. Normal application of the Rational Method assumes that all <br />of the runoff is coll ected by the storm sewer or gutter. In the initial <br />design the time of concentration is, in part, dependent upon the flow time in <br />the sewer. However, during the major runoff the sewers should be fully taxed <br />and cannot accept all the water flowing to the inlets. This additional water <br />then flows by the inlets and continues overland, generally at a significantly <br />lower velocity than the water in the storm sewers. This requires an analysis <br />of different concentration times between underground flow and overland flow. <br />This difference in travel times provides opportunities for the storm sewer to <br />continue flowing full for a longer period and to, in effect, carry significant <br />portions of the major runoff. The basis for this increased benefit is that <br />the excess water from one inlet will flow to the next inlet downhill, using <br />the overland route. If that inlet too is fully taxed, the water will often <br />cDntinue on until capacity is available in the storm sewer. The analysis of <br />this aspect of the interaction between the storm sewer system and the major <br />storm runoff is complex. The most useful procedure for this analysis is the <br />routing of hydrographs through the two routes concurrently. <br /> <br />5-1-84 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />