Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />Table 1-2. Peak Discharges and Area-discharge Data for this Study <br /> Area (A) Peak Discharge, Q (cfs) <br />Location (sq mi) lOO-year Q/A 500. year Q/A QoooIQUlO <br />Dolores River 85 2800 33 6000 71 2.1 <br />at Rico <br />Dolores River 105 2655 25 3183 30 1.2 <br />below Rico <br />freq. analysis <br />Scotch Creek 11 400 36 700 63 1.7 <br />Silver Creek 7 350 50 500 71 1.4 <br /> <br />Hydraulic Analyses <br /> <br />Water surface profiles were computed using the Army Corp of Engineers' HEC-2 <br />computer program (ref. 8). The iterative program applies the standard step method to <br />solve energy and head-loss equations for one-dimensional steady or gradually varied <br />flow. Subcritica1 conditions were assumed. <br /> <br />Cross-section geometry for this study was determined from recent 1: 1 ,200 scale <br />topographic maps with 2-foot contour intervals (ref. 9). The data was refined and <br />verified by field measurements. Bridges and culverts were measured in the field. <br />Cross section locations are indicated by flood water elevations on the flood map. <br /> <br />Initially, Manning's roughness coefficients ("n-values") were estimated based on field <br />observations and standard ranges of values (ref. 10). However, due to the high <br />gradients of the channels, roughness coefficients were adjusted to conform with data <br />from similar high-gradient streams in Colorado (ref. 11). The previous study found a <br />strong correlation between slope and hydraulic radius with roughness for high-gradient <br /> <br />4 <br />