Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />suggest a larger tributary area than that used in this analysis. However, <br />recent field inspections have indicated that a large portion of the lower <br />basin that would otherwise be tributary is in fact cut off by the Sixth <br />Avenue Freeway. Drainage in this area would tend to run along the frontage <br />road just south of the freeway, eventually finding its way into lakewood <br />Gulch. No major problems were noted in this area, except for the potential <br />inundation of the frontage road during extreme rainfall events. In addition <br />to this basin modification, others were made according to the local street <br />grades in some areas. In general, basin boundaries often diverge from those <br />evident from surface contours in urban areas. <br /> <br />By comparing Tables I I 1-1 and 111-2, it can be seen that future development <br />flows are not significantly greater than those for present conditions; <br />typically differing by about 10 percent. The reason for this is the large <br />extent of urban development presently existing in the basin, as well as <br />its concentration in the lower half. Most open areas to be developed in the <br />future are located in the ~pper half of the basin, so that the effects of <br />increases in subbasin hydrographs due to future development ;n these are", <br />will be minimized. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Hydrographs illustrating the 5-year and 100-year flows for the various <br />subbasins under future development conditions are given in the Hydrologic <br />Appendix. In addition, storm runoff volumes for future development are pre- <br />sented in the Hydrological Appendix. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In addition to peak rates of flow, storm runoff volumes were determined <br />for present conditions. These volumes are presented in the Hydrological <br />Appendix. <br /> <br />Future Development Peak Flows <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />As discussed in Section I I, the South lakewood Gulch drainage basin is <br />presently about 70 percent developed. Based upon future land use maps <br />provided by the City of lakewood officials, peak flows have been de- <br />termined for the 5, 10, 50, andl00-year flood frequencies, and are pre- <br />sented in Table 111-2 below. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE 111-2 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS <br />FUTURE DEVELOPMENT <br />(All Values in Cubic Feet per Second) <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Subbasin <br /> <br />Peak Flow for Various Frequencies <br />5-Year 10-Year 50-Year lOO-Year <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 @ Addenbrooke Pond 120 180 210 240 <br />2 @ Rockmon t Pon d 370 560 670 740 <br />3 @ 1st Ave. Pond 450 670 800 890 <br />4 @ Wadsworth Blvd. 540 800 960 1,070 <br />5 @ lakewood Gulch 630 950 l,130 1,260 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I. <br />