Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FY 82-83 if no expenditures are made from the fund during the <br />fiscal year. An expenditure of monies in the fund for water <br />project construction has never been made. <br /> <br />Property Taxes; Section 11 of Article X of the Colorado <br />Constitution permits the state to levy a property tax of up to <br />four mills, with an additional one mill levy for the erect ion and <br />maintenance of builnings at state educational institutions. <br />Although used previously, this state assessed property tax was <br />phased out in the 1960s. At current property valuations, a one <br />mill levy would generate about $15 million per year. <br /> <br />General Obligation Financing <br /> <br />The above sources of tax revenues are not insubstantial. <br />However, these must be measured against all capital investment <br />needs facing the state, as well as the hundreds of millions of <br />dollars of needed water project construction and rehabilitation, <br />including "up-front" cost-sharing on federal projects. When <br />viewed from this perspective, the historical policy of "pay as <br />you go" may not be respons ive to the capital intens ive <br />requirements of water proj ect development andrehabilitat ion <br />which must be addressed over the next two or three decades. <br /> <br />I f "paying as you go" is found to not meet Colorado 's <br />captial investment needs, then serious consideration must be <br />given to commencing a general obligation financing program. <br />Implementation of such a program would require two things: <br /> <br />(1) Amendment of the State Constitution, which presently <br />specifies that "the state shall not contract any debt <br />by loan in any form," except in a very few instances <br />(Section 4, Article XI), and <br /> <br />(2) Pledges of specified future tax revenues which would be <br />used to retire any indebtedness for want of suff icient <br />project revenues. <br /> <br />With respect to pledges of future tax revenues, there are, <br />as discussed above, several possible sources. However, not all <br />taxes are equally attractive for general obligation financing <br />purposes. This is because the amount of capital which can be <br />borrowed is a funct ion of the ant ic ipa ted stabil i ty of the tax <br />revenues which are pledged to retire the indebtedness to be <br />incurred. <br /> <br />The more stable the tax revenues are expected to be, the <br />lower the revenue to annual debt service ratio requirement will <br />be. For example, property taxes are regarded by investment <br />bankers as the best source of pledged revenues. Thus, for every <br />$3 of property taxes pledged, about $1 to $1.25 of capital can be <br /> <br />-8- <br />