Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE-I, CONTINUED <br /> <br />the information in Table-4. The U(,odedareas for Coal Creek are presented <br />on Plates I through 4. <br /> <br />Field <br />Identification <br /> <br />Elevation <br /> <br />SCS-BM_2 <br /> <br />49B5.37 <br /> <br />Location <br /> <br />The 100-year floodplain, aa delineated on the flooded atea maps, meets <br />the requirements of the State Floodplain Management Program. Upon officIal <br />approval and designation of this report by the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board, these water aurfaee elevations and flooded areaS for the 100-year <br />flood will aupersode all previous flood ha~ard information and data for <br />the administration of the subject floodplains. <br /> <br />SCS-BM-3 <br /> <br />5010.71 <br /> <br />SCS-BM-4 <br /> <br />5024.95 <br /> <br />USC&GS <br /> <br />5024.96 <br /> <br />SGS-BM-5 <br /> <br />5057.77 <br /> <br />Cap and Rebar, N. side of Kenosha Rd. <br />47; N.W. of intersection of County <br />line Rd. and Kenoaha Rd.; 7' s. of <br />Cone. hr. strlL.; 2' W. of Tel. pole. <br /> <br />Cap and Rebar, 2' s. of fence post; <br />14' north of N. rail over irr. canal; <br />26' N. of centerline of gravel road. <br /> <br />Cap and rebar, 2' S. of street sign <br />(PierceandPerryStreet);13'S.II,of <br />red fire hyd, 37' N.II. of intersection <br />of Pierce and Petty St.; 176' N. oI <br />N. railroad track. <br /> <br />D. Floodway Delineation <br /> <br />When encroachments onto the natural floodplain are allowed, such as <br />artificial fill, the flood carrying capacity is reduced, The depth of water <br />or the flow velocity in the remaining floodplain ate a ~U8t normally increase <br />to convey the Same magnitude of flood, and thus the flood hazard to areas <br />near the encroach~nt may be increased. However, the economic gain from <br />developments or encroachments onto the floodplain must be weighed against <br />the resulting increased flood hazard. Floodplain management programs gUst <br />determine the acceptable limits of encroach~nt which will allow opti~um <br />econc~ic uSe of the floodplain. <br /> <br />At Erie, nesr S.E. 'corner of city <br />limits; 0.2 mi. E. of Kuner Pickle <br />Plant; 44 ft. ~. and 1 ft. lower <br />than Colorado State Highway 240: 37 ft. <br />E. and I fc. lower than center of <br />Crsck; in concrete post; sCandard <br />tabletstamped"JR-5J-19485026." <br /> <br />Cap and rehar, l' N.W. oI Cone. fence <br />corner post. E.II.-N.X. fence line. <br />Appr"",5ClO'S."foldco.l..inepil; <br />lO'E.ofcentctlineofN.-S.lane. <br /> <br />C. Flooded Areas <br /> <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />The concept of the floodway haa been adopted by the National Flood <br />Insurance Program as a tool in assiating local communities in this aspect of <br />floodplain management. The floodway ia defined as the channel and floodplain <br />width which must be kept free of encroachment such that the IOO-year flood is <br />conveyed "ithout "substantial" increases in flood depths, As a ..inimu.., standard, <br />FEtiA li~its the depth increase to 1.0 loot provided hazsrdous velocities are <br />not produced. The following table lista the Iloodwsy criceria recommended <br />by the agencies sponsoring this study in their respective jurisdictions. <br /> <br />The Ilooded ares maps are derived from the water surface profiles, <br />The hase ~apping published in this report has a 2-foot contour interval <br />and a acale of I-inch equal to 400 feet, If needed. the floodplain prod"~ed <br />by other frequency Iloods could he readily delineated on these maps using <br /> <br />-,- <br /> <br />- , - <br />