My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05115
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD05115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:11:55 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:16:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Boulder
Weld
Community
Erie
Stream Name
Coal Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Floodplain Information Report
Date
8/1/1980
Prepared For
Erie / Boulder County / Weld County
Prepared By
Water Resource Consultants
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />CHAPTER VII <br />DAMAGE ASSESSME~T <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />A. General <br /> <br />Based on th~ scope of services, the st~dy area was divided into four <br />different reaches. These reaches are defined as rollo~s: <br /> <br />1. Upstream li~it of study to Perry Street. <br /> <br />2. Petty Street to Briggs Street. <br /> <br />PARI II <br /> <br />, <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />. <br /> <br />3. Briggs Street to Kenosha Road <br /> <br />4. Kenosha Road to Coal Creek confluence with Boulder Creek. <br /> <br />FLOOD CONTROL AND FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN <br /> <br />The object of this evaluacion is to identify thcaverar,c annual flood <br />d<lmage poc"ntial within each sClldy reach. These d.:lmages can be elimin.ttcd <br />or subst.mtially reduced throOJgh planned improvc'"",nt, "hieh will be discussed <br />in Chapter IX, Alternative Plans Considered. and Gh"pter Xl, ECOtlOmic Analys;. <br />of the Recommended Plan. <br /> <br />A detailed damage analysis was canducted far Reaches 2 and 4. An anal- <br />ysis was not made for Reaches 1 and 3 because no impravements or hi~h-damage <br />featurcs prescntly exist. Thc potential damages for Reaches I and 3 wauld <br /> <br />he limited to items which could include soil erosion, agricultural losses, <br />and raad inundation. <br /> <br />Total flood damages is the sUm of all dir~ct and indirect damages. <br />Direct and indirect damages for the respective rcaches whiCh were coosidered <br />areas follows: <br /> <br />I. Direct Damages <br />a. Residential <br /> <br />Structur<,s <br /> <br />Contents <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />-59- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.