Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />VI. ALTERNATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Table 21. Average Annual Flood Damages <br /> <br />General Considerations <br /> <br />This chapter discusses the alternative improvement plans and the concep- <br /> <br /> <br />tual designs to implement these plans. First, the general considerations used <br /> <br /> <br />in formulating and designing the alternatives are presented. <br /> <br /> <br />Conceptual drainageway improvement plans were formulated to alleviate <br /> <br />flood damages in the Boxelder Creek-Cooper Slough Basins. In the formulation <br /> <br /> <br />of improvement alternatives the following factors have been considered: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Location Annual Flood Damages <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Boxelder Creek <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reach 1 <br /> <br />$ 23,200 <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Long term relief of flood problems. <br /> <br />Reach 2 <br /> <br />$ 7,670 <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Adequacy of existing detention and conveyance. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reach 3 <br /> <br />$ 5,710 <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Increases in stormwater flows across downstream properties due to <br />development upstream. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Cooper Slough <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Available right-of-way. <br /> <br />Reach 1 <br /> <br />$150,000 <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Ease of maintenance and access. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reach 2 <br /> <br />$712,700 <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Water quality improvements. <br /> <br />7. Erosion control. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The design criter~a utilized for formulating these master drainageway <br /> <br /> <br />improvement plans are those contained in the "Larimer County Storm Water <br /> <br /> <br />Management Manual" (reference 11). Specific considerations for the Boxelder <br /> <br /> <br />Creek-Cooper Slough drainageway improvements are summarized below. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1. Open Channels: Two types of channels are commonly used - natural and <br /> <br /> <br />constructed. Constructed channels may be lined or unlined. Unlined open <br /> <br /> <br />channels with grass cover are preferred due to lower velocities and the <br /> <br /> <br />natural appearance. In addition, the shape of unlined channels can be chosen <br /> <br />to create additional sociological benefits by establishing greenbelts or <br /> <br /> <br />recreational opportunities. <br /> <br /> <br />Lined open channels are sometimes required due to limited right of way <br /> <br /> <br />and topographical or hydraulic considerations. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2. Hydraulic Structures: Flow characteristics may be controlled with the <br /> <br /> <br />proper use of hydraulic structures. Hydraulic structures such as energy <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />57 <br /> <br />5B <br /> <br />I <br />