Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />Hvdraulic Analvsis <br />Hydraulic methods used for the approximate floodplain delineations shown on the Norwood <br />FHBM panels are not available or have not been documented by FEMA. For future studies, an <br />approximate loo-year flood elevation at a particular location on the river may be obtained by <br />using the loo-year peak flow value (as provided in this report) in conjunction with an acceptable <br />hydraulic analysis. Hydraulic analyses for determining Ioo-year water surface elevations for <br />approximate floodplains may be performed using FEMA's Quick-2 computer program, the Corps <br />of Engineers' HEC-2 computer program, F1owmaster, or other acceptable hydraulic methods. <br />Channel and floodplain cross-sections may be obtained from detailed topographic mapping or <br />from field surveys. Cross-sections obtained from USGS quadrangle maps are not advised. <br /> <br />To investigate the appropriateness of the FHBM the floodplain, the Town's topographic mapping <br />and F10wmaster hydraulic software was used to calculate normal depth for Ed Joe Draw/Gurley <br />Ditch upstream and downstream of the highway. Normal depth represents the depth at which the <br />channel would flow absent any downstream channel constrictions that may cause the depth to <br />increase. If downstream constrictions exist, the normal depth calculation will result in a <br />floodplain width that is too narrow. Table 2 shows estimated floodplain widths calculated <br />assuming normal depth and those widths shown on the maps. The approximate floodplains are <br />shown in Figures 3 and 4 in the Appendix. <br /> <br />s ma '-year 0 IplalD WI s or oe raw <br />Location Calculated 100-year Floodplain Width on Floodplain Width on San <br /> FloodDlaln Width "' Norwood FHBM Mlauel Co. FIS '" <br />Uostream of Hiahwav 230 210 280 <br />Downstream of Hillhwav 200 150 210 <br /> <br />E ti ted 100 <br /> <br />Table 2 <br />nodI' 'dth f; EdJ D <br /> <br />Notes: <br />'" <br />., <br /> <br />Calculated using normal depth and cross-sections from the Town's topographic mapping. <br />The San Miguel Co. FIRMs do not show floodplains wnhin or immediately adjacent to the Town. The <br />measurements are taken in Ed Joe Draw approximately l!. mile upstream of the town limits and <br />approximately 'A mile downstream of the town limits. <br /> <br />Some downstream constrictions exist which may cause a wider floodplain. Because this analysis <br />clearly shows a flood risk, it is advised that floodplain shown on the FHBM be used for planning <br />purposes along Ed Joe Draw/Gurley Ditch. <br /> <br />Floodplain Mappin!!: <br />The existing FHBM and FIS for Norwood depicts areas subject to loo-year flooding based on <br />approximate technical methods. These maps do not show flood profiles, base flood elevations, <br />or sufficient detail in order for County officials, engineers, developers, and land owners to make <br />floodplain determinations with any certainty. The Colorado Water Conservation Board can be <br />contacted to request technical assistance for approximate floodplain analyses as needed. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />- <br />