My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05029
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD05029
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:48:01 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:12:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Report of the Floodplain Management Forum
Date
6/8/2000
Prepared For
U.S
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Michael Ellegood, Flood Control District of Maricopa County, Arizona, suggested the <br />following: <br /> <br />. There should be floodplain insurance for everyone who has a mortgage; nationally, 35 <br />percent of all claims are made by people who do not live in a designated floodplain. <br /> <br />. Hazards should be determined not just on the basis of elevation but also on geomorphology <br />a nd erosion of watercourses. <br /> <br />Larry Larson, Association of State Floodplain Managers, suggested modifications to the <br />prevIous recommendations: <br /> <br />. Examine all recommendations and program policies and make development decisions on the <br />t,asis of "no adverse impact" on the floodplain; this concept takes into consideration future <br />( onditions. <br /> <br />. Encourage and provide incentives for communities to develop comprehensive community <br />I,lans so more communities can accomplish what Tulsa has done. <br /> <br />Richard Krimm, Federal Emergency Management Agency, retired, recommended that <br /> <br />. Insurance companies should redline new or rebuilt structures in velocity zones and <br />floodways. <br /> <br />. FEMA should promote setbacks in high-erosion coastal areas. <br /> <br />Mr. Witt responded that a recent study showed that 64 percent of people had no idea how to <br />prevent flooding disasters. In the 1990s, 2.5 million Americans moved into the southern and <br />soutleastern United States. This means that many people are moving into high-risk flood and <br />hurr: cane-risk areas and are unaware of the risks and have no knowledge of prevention. <br /> <br />JoAlln Howard, Federal Emergency Management Agency, added that she believes the national <br />poli(;y needs to move from a loss-prevention focus to beneficial use of the floodplain. <br /> <br />Bretr Hulsey, Sierra Club, Midwest Office, pointed out that many FIRMs are based on 50-year- <br />old data. In repetitive-loss situations, updating FIRMs should be a priority and part of the <br />disaHter assistance package. He also expressed appreciation for FEMA's leadership on the U.S. <br />Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) replacement for Nationwide Permit 26. <br /> <br />Mr. Witt responded that in the FY 2001 budget, FEMA has requested, and the House has <br />approved, $30 million to revise FIRMs after a disaster. <br /> <br />Jon Kusler, Association of State Wetland Managers, expressed his support for Mr. Larson's <br />posHon of a no-adverse-impact policy. <br /> <br />Floodplain Management Forum <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.