My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04950
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04950
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:47 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:08:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
54
County
Jefferson
Community
Unincorporated Jefferson County
Stream Name
Lena Gulch
Basin
South Platte
Title
Pleasant View Drainage Study
Date
11/1/1975
Designation Date
3/1/1976
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The infiltration rate is the rate at which runoff passes through the soil <br />surface. This rate decreases as tne soil becomes saturated and generally <br />reaches a steady rate. The value used in the Lena Gulch Study varied frOIil <br />0.72 to 1.6 inches/hour "hich "as determined from field measureinent, The <br />value used in this report '\;vas 0.5 :lnches/hour due to 1:he greater affect <br />that South Table Mountain has upon this smaller basin. The Im'ler infiltra- <br />tion rate used '\;vould theoretically proctice a higher runoff rate and volume. <br /> <br />C. FLOOD PLAIN BOUGDARY DETEP~lINAtION <br /> <br />1. Criteria <br /> <br />The flood plain evaluation "as completed by using the Corps of Engineers <br />HEC-2 Water Surface Profiles Computer Program. This program Has developed <br />by the Corps of Engineers at Davis, California and Hill compllte the Hater <br />surface elevation ir~ natural or improvE?d channel conditions. <br /> <br />The data used in computing this "ater surface "as provided by the design <br />engineer for a particular project. This project Has defined by use of 35 <br />channel cross-sections. The exist:Lng culve.rts "ere considered to be plugged <br />by the floatable debris which is r<eadily available along the drainage-\my. <br />Nannings roughness coefficient use<i was 0.04 to 0.06,5 in the channel area <br />and 0.045 to 0.08 ill the overbank Ureas. <br /> <br />The flo" rates used varied along the drainage-"ay since thE,re are several <br />lateral drainage-Ha:rs Hhich contribute.. The tabulation of these floH rates <br />is given in the HydJeaulics Section ill Table IV-I. <br /> <br />2. Analysis <br /> <br />The lOa-year Flood ,"imits Here determined for the drainage-"ay since the <br />current Jefferson County Subdivision Regulations use this as the standard <br />flood from which subdivisions are to be protected. The lOa-year Flood Limits <br />are shm-m in Figure III-3.as provided in the envelope at the end of this <br />report. <br /> <br />//1 <br />T <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.