Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />I. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />'. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />Hydrolol!ic Analysis <br />The Adams County FrS presents both detailed and approximate floodplain delineations, Detailed <br />delineations were developed using standard hydrology methods and are mostly well documented. <br />Hydrologic information used for the FEMA approximate floodplain delineations are not <br />available or were not documented by FEMA. However, the Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />(CWCB), using regional regression methodologies for computing 100-year flood-flow values, <br />has developed acceptable hydrologic information for undeveloped basins, This methodology <br />was used for undeveloped basins in the eastern portion of the county, <br /> <br />Because of the complex hydrology of flood control improvements associated with urban <br />development, this methodology was not utilized for basins within the Denver metropolitan area, <br />For most of the developed basins, drainage reports and basin master plans are available from the <br />Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. Discharges for the developed basins were obtained <br />from these reports and are shown in the Appendix. <br /> <br />The CWCB regional regression equation methodology is fully described in a publication by the <br />CWCB entitled "Guidelines for Determining 100-year Flood Flows for Approximate Floodplains <br />in Colorado". Due to regional differences in flood flow approximations, three separate equations <br />were used in the county, The CWCB regression equations are shown in Table 3. <br /> <br />a e . el!lona el!reSSlOn ~quatlOns or n eve ope ams ounty <br />Sub- Discharge Equation Drainage Basin <br />Region ID Sub-Re,gion Name (cfs) Limitations (sq,mi.) <br />SPL-I South Platte, Eastern Plains QIOO = 707,9(A)o6S-l 2 to 1090 <br />SPL-2 South Platte, Southern Foothills QIOO = 1005,5(A)o638 I to 170 <br />SPL-3 South Platte, Northern Foothills QIOO = 800,8(A)om I to 445 <br /> <br />T bl 3 R . <br /> <br />IR <br /> <br />E <br /> <br />f U d <br /> <br />dAd <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />For the equations in Table 3, the QIOO is the 100-year peak flow in cubic feet per second, and A is <br />the upstream (contributing) drainage area in square miles, The regression equations are only valid <br />for the range of drainage areas as shown, Calculation worksheets are shown in the appendix, <br />None of the stream gages have a period-of-record long enough to verify the estimated discharges <br />using USGS Bulletin 17B procedures, <br /> <br />The 100-year peak discharge for each of the undeveloped approximate floodplains is shown in <br />Table 4, As shown, Todd Creek Tributary 2 and North Tributary 7 have drainage basin areas that <br />are below the minimum applicable basin size for the equations, Nearly the entire Todd Creek <br />basin is currently being developed as ranchettes with unknown drainage improvements, <br />Therefore, the calculated discharges are likely inaccurate for existing and future conditions <br />within the basin. However, the discharges would have applied at the time that the FrS study was <br />conducted, <br /> <br />6 <br />