My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04852
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04852
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:29 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:05:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
San Miguel
Community
Telluride
Stream Name
San Miguel River
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Title
CLOMR - Affected Community 080168 - Case No. 96-08-190R
Date
6/30/1997
Prepared For
Telluride
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. MODEL PARAMETERS (from mode/llHd to...1IiH lQO.YH' wit., surface -'ev.lionJ <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Discharges: <br /> <br />Upstream Limit <br /> <br />Downstream Limit <br /> <br />540 <br />980 <br />1280 <br />2330 <br /> <br />540 <br />980 <br />1280 <br />2330 <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />10-year ..................................... <br /> <br />50-year ..................................... <br /> <br />100-year .................................... <br /> <br />500-year .................................... <br /> <br />Attach diagram showing changes in 1 OO-year discharge <br /> <br />Explain how the starLing water surface elevations were determined <br />surface elevations <br /> <br />Used effective water <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Give range of friction 1088 -aicients (MoMi",', "N") Channel . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />0.040 <br /> <br />Overbanks ...... <br /> <br />0.045 <br /> <br />IHriction 1088 coefficients are cIiJ1'erent anywhere along the revbed reach from those used to develop the FIRM, <br />give location, value used in the dective FIS, and revised values and an explanation as to how the revised value! <br />were determined. <br /> <br />Location <br /> <br />FIS <br /> <br />Revised <br /> <br />Explain': <br /> <br />4. Describe how the cross section geometry data were determined (e.,., field survey, topo,raphic map. w.ken from <br />preuioua ,tully) and list cross sections that were added. <br /> <br />Field survey was undertaken to develop enhanced topographic <br />maooinq. Sections extracted from digital terrain model and <br />compared against original FIS sections. <br /> <br />5. Were natural channel bank, selected as the lOcation of the left. and right channel banks in the model? <br />lID Yes 0 No Ifno,explainwhynot: <br /> <br />iii...,... "...uIlc A"'.ylls 'OIm <br /> <br />MT.2 fOlm' <br /> <br />'.ge ] oj <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.