My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04852
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04852
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:29 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:05:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
San Miguel
Community
Telluride
Stream Name
San Miguel River
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Title
CLOMR - Affected Community 080168 - Case No. 96-08-190R
Date
6/30/1997
Prepared For
Telluride
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY a.M.8. 8u,cI~n No. J067.0148 FEMA USE ONlY <br />RIVERINE HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS FORM E'p;'~f July J1. 1997 <br />PUBLIC BURDEN DISCLOSURE NOTIC(,; <br /> <br />Public reporting burden for this form is estimated \0 average 2.25 hours per response. The burden estimate includes t <br />time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, a: <br />completing and reviewing the form. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestio <br />for reducing this burden, \0: Information Collections Management, Federal Emergenc)' Management Agency, 500 <br />Street, S. W., Washington, DC 20472; and \0 the Omce of Management and Budget, PaJlt'rwork Reduction Project (30€ <br />0148), Wash in n, DC 20503. <br /> <br />Community Name: <br /> <br />Telluride <br /> <br />Flooding Source: San Miquel Ri ver <br />(DIU form for c4ch (lood.ng lIourc,) <br />Project NameJIdentiJier: Blocks 15 and 22 <br /> <br />,. REACH TO IE REVISED <br /> <br />Downstream limit: <br />Upstream limit: <br /> <br />Oak Street (FIS. near section .AR) <br />Pine Street (FIS, section AU) <br />2. EFFECTIVE FIS <br /> <br />o Not studied <br />o Studied by approximate methods <br />Downstream Iimitofstudy <br />Upstream limit of study <br />~ Studied by detailed methods <br />Downstream limit of study <br />Upstream limit of study <br />[] Floodway delineated <br />Downstream limit of Flood way <br />Upstream limit of Flood way <br /> <br />Station 20480 <br />AU Station 21100 <br /> <br />Station 20480 <br />AU Station 21100 <br /> <br />3. HYDRAUliC ANAL YSIS- <br />Why is the hydraulic analysis different from that used to develop the FIRM. (Check aUIMI apply) <br />o Not studied in FIS <br />o Improved hydrologic dat.aJanalysis. Explain: <br /> <br />IX! Improved hydraulic analysis. Explain: <br /> <br />Detailed site topoqraphy developed <br /> <br />o Flood control structure. Explain: <br /> <br />o Other. Explain: <br /> <br />PEMA Form ,'..,e. OCT" <br /> <br />Riverine H,.r..ullc Anelytis Form <br /> <br />MT.2 form. <br /> <br />'Ige 1. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.