Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />For area adjustment 3, 6-hour duration hyetographs were created by adding rainfall <br />exceeding the 2-hour stonn depth uniformly over the extended duration. The 6-hour <br />hyetographs were then adjusted according to the 20 to 30 square mile area adjustments <br />shown in Table 4-2 of the Rainfall chapter of the USDCM (UDFCD, 1969). <br /> <br />For area adjustment 4, 6-hour duration hyetographs were created as described for area <br />adjustment 3 and adjusted according to the 50 to 75 square mile area adjustments shown <br />in Table 4-2 of the Rainfall chapter of the USDCM (UDFCD, 1969). <br /> <br />Hyetographs for the 500-year event were based on the same temporal distribution as the <br />lOO-year event. <br /> <br />3.6 CUHP Modelling <br /> <br />CUHP models for existing and future development conditions were developed for each <br />watershed (total of twelve base models). The 24 stonns described in the previous section <br />were modelled in each of the twelve base CUHP models. The subwatershed characteris- <br />tics required for the CUHP models included the identification number, area, length, <br />centroid length, slope, impervious percentage, retention storage losses, and infiltration <br />losses. The methods for estimating the subwatershed characteristics are described below <br />and a summary table of the characteristics is shown in Appendix J. <br /> <br />3.6.1 Delineation of Subwatersheds <br /> <br />Subwatersheds were delineated on 1:24,000 scale digitized USGS quadrangle maps. The <br />boundaries were detennined based on the topography of the maps, existing roadways! <br />bridges, and existing culverts. The subwatershed areas, lengths, and centroid lengths <br />were estimated from the digitized 1:24,000 scale USGS quadrangle maps. <br /> <br />3.6.2 Imperviousness <br /> <br />The imperviousness of each subwatershed was determined based on superimposing the <br />maps of existing and future development condition imperviousness (Appendices C and D) <br />onto the subwatershed maps. Based on the assumed impervious values for each land use <br />area, a weighted impervious percentage for each subwatershed was calculated. For exist- <br />ing conditions, imperviousness was typically 1 percent. For future conditions, the imper- <br />viousness ranged from 2 to 85 percent. <br /> <br />3.6.3 Slope <br /> <br />The slopes for each subwatershed were estimated according to the weighted slope method <br />documented in the USDCM. The length of each subwatershed was broken up into small <br />segments. The slope of each of the segments was computed and corrected according to <br />Figure 4-1 of the Runoff chapter of the USDCM (UDFCD, 1969). The segment lengths <br /> <br />DENlOOISI86.WP5 <br /> <br />3-5 <br />