Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />L ',' ,-"'~-.;;:, "'" <br /> <br />.J;t:-.;i/~Ii <br /> <br /> <br />All Flood Insurance Study Contractors <br />Pag", Thre3 <br /> <br />B. A "Sununary of Discharges" Table is being included in published <br />reports, instead of the former "Frequency-Discharge, Drainage <br />Area Curve." The new format requires tabulation, at specific <br />locations (e.g., bridges, corporate limits, etc.), of the 10-, <br />50-, 100-, and SOO-year storm peak discharges and their corre- <br />sponding drainage areas. Study contractors are currently <br />being asked by the TECs to supply this backup data. The TECs <br />will make the required revisions. <br /> <br />III. Maps <br /> <br />A./corporate limits should be verified between the Vicinity Map <br />and FIRM/FBFMs. <br /> <br />B. <br />;/ <br /> <br />Flood and floodway boundaries must be shown as clear and con- <br />tinuous lines on the FIRM and FBFM. Study contractors are <br />asked to show flood and floodway boundaries through bridges, <br />indicating the extent of flooding below the bridge, even <br />though flow over the bridge may not occur. This is per <br />current FIA policy. <br /> <br />C. "/Base flood elevation (BFE) lines should be located on the FIRM <br />" <br />to depict the elevations of the IOO-year flood, rounded to the <br />nearest whole foot, at changes in the slope of the 100-year <br />Flood Profiles, and at corporate limits, zone boundaries, and <br />the upstream limits of study. Location of BFEs at breaks in <br />the water-surface profile slope allows for the most accurate <br />interpolation of elevations between BFEs on the FIRM. <br /> <br />D. ~ource materials provided to the TECs for the preparation of <br />base maps must be accompanied by source and date information. <br /> <br /> <br />Of course, the deficiencies listed here are chiefly of an editorial or graphical <br />nature. Numerous significant technical errors have been found in the hydro- <br />logic and hydraulic analyses, and in the consideration of future hydraulic <br />conditions in some studies reviewed since the TEC process was initiated in <br />1974. However, as expected, studies having such significant problems have <br />been relatively few in number. The above comments, therefore, are offered as <br />specific instances where the 1976 FIA Guidelines and Specifications have been <br />either revised or frequently overlooked. We appreciate any reaction you may <br />lave to these comments. If you have any questions on them, please contact <br />~.Jl.i.lle.r....Qi...E.IA..Ai;.,j2.Q2.L..4.12;;:~J_. <br /> <br />J/.. <br /> <br />/,,.,, ) <br /> <br />))-/ <br /> <br />-"7 <br /> <br />/, <br />, <br /> <br />)].111') <br /> <br />