Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Big Elk Meadow and Broomfield storms occurrE~d in early May and were <br />dominated by snowfall at elevations above 10,000 feet. HMS dismissed the <br />Broomfield storm from further analysis since its ston'n total rainfall was much less <br />than other general storms being evaluated. HMS adjusted the time of <br />occurrence two weeks into the warm season before maximization for the May <br />general storms. Standard storm maximization is given in HMR 55A (Table 13.1) <br />for each of the historic storms for 10 square mile arElas. Since this area closely <br />approximates the size of the Mason Reservoir drainage basin these values were <br />accepted for use in the present study. They were checked and the warm season <br />adjustment was made before elevation adjustments were applied. <br /> <br />Table 7 shows the maximized, seasonally adjusted and elevation adjusted <br />values of peak storm rainfall for each of the historic storms. As indicated earlier, <br />the small size of the Mason Reservoir basin allows for easy application of the 10 <br />square mile values in HMR 55A (Table 13.1) to the adjustment calculations. No <br />area PMP maps were drawn for the basin for this reason. However, Figure 8 <br />shows the complex topography surrounding this basin and is included to assist in <br />orographic discussions. Note that elevation adjusted rainfalls were calculated <br />using both HMR 55A and HMR 57 methodologies and the HMR 55A values are <br />listed in Table 7.. <br /> <br />HMR 57 closely mirrors HMR 55A in its elevation adjustment methodol09Y for <br />local storms and convective storms. For elevations above 6,000 feet msl, a <br />decrease in local storm PMP of 9 percent per thousand feet of elevation gain <br />was utilized, approximating a pseudo-adiabatic decrease in moisture available <br />for convective activity. HMR 57 cites a study carril~d out by Hentz and Kelly <br />(1989) as support for its elevation adjustment mE!thodology. This study <br />investigated heavy rainfall events and their characteristics at elevations above <br />7,500 feet along the Colorado Front Rangl~. This citation provides a pc)int of <br />validation for the HMS precipitation elevaticlO adjustment methodolc)91Y. <br /> <br />Table 8 shows the elevation adjustment of the historic general storm maximized <br />rainfalls from Table 13.1 and their incremental extension to 72-hour general <br />storm convention. Information on both the Cherry Creek and the Gibson dam <br />storms are included for review since both are close to the Mason Reservoir <br />transposition envelope. Please note that the values in this table for the Frijole <br />Creek storm were obtained from information on the storm in the Colorado <br />Climate Center's Extreme Precipitation Event files and personal communication <br />with Hal Bishop of Bishop-Brogden Associates, a Denver engineering firm which <br />completed a hydrologic study of this storm (BisllOp, '1982). <br /> <br />The selection of a controlling general storm PMP from Table 7 shows the <br />infiuence of both the complex convective and general precipitation event storms <br />at different time intervals. 1"01' time periods of G hours and less the complex <br />convective general storm dominates and exceeds even the local storm PMP <br /> <br />3] <br />