Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />- 12 - <br /> <br />Each flood hydrograph for the Blue River was routed through the <br />Goose Pasture Tarn. The routed flood hydrograph was added to <br />the base flow in the Blue River and that hydrograph was used <br />in the hydraulic computations to determine the lateral extent <br />of flooding. <br /> <br />Each flood hydrograph was routed through the Goose Pasture Tarn. <br />The routed flood hydrograph was added to the base flow in the <br />Blue River and that hydrograph was used in the hydraulic compu- <br />tations to determine the lateral extent of flooding. <br /> <br />Other techniques used to reduce the basic precipitation and runoff <br />data in understanding the hydrology of the Breckenridge area <br />include the Pearson Log III, Hazen and snowmelt analysis. The <br />three methods are statistical in nature, differing primarily in <br />their techniques in determining the skew coefficients. The <br />Pearson Log III and the Hazen methods reduce the peak discharges <br />recorded at the Hoosier Pass snow course station and the peak <br />discharge for the s~e year. The Pearson Log III Analysis was <br />run on a number of,streams in the area on which USGS records are <br />maintained. The results are shown in Table 5. <br /> <br />The primary drawback to the statistical methods is that the USGS gage <br />is located downstream from Breckenridge and encompasses a much <br />larger area than what would affect the town of Breckenridge. To <br />reduce the statistical flows it would be necessary to derive a <br />valid, area reduction factor. Application of the SCS technique <br />which defines an area reduction factor raised to the 0.8 power <br />results in peak flows through the town of Breckenridge for the <br />statistical methods to range from 560 cfs to 890 cfs. <br /> <br />DESIGN RUNOFF <br /> <br />Table 6 summarizes the flows at the various design points along <br />the Blue'River derived by MITCAT, which modeled the thunderstorm <br />condition, and Pearson Log III analysis, which was the statistical <br />method. Also shown is the runoff from a storm centered over <br />various tributaries below the Tarn summarized from Figure 2. The <br />design flow selected for each frequency interval has been underlined. <br /> <br />Using the design flows in Table 6 discharge-frequency curves were <br />prepared for each design point. These are shown in Figures 3 <br />through 9. Figure 10 is the discharge-frequency curve for the <br />tributaries. <br /> <br />~ Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers, Inc. <br />