My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04787
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:15 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:59:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Colorado Association of Storm Water and Floodplain Managers 8th annual Conference
Date
9/22/1997
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
CASFM
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />URBAN STREAM RESTORATION PROGRAMS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />For some communities in California, local and state agencies have """H7M the need <br /> <br />for a program to mitigate the adverse affects of flooding, erosion and bank instability. <br />California's Department of Water Resources (DWR) initiated the Urban Stream Restoration <br />Program in 1985 to assist communities in reducing damages from flooding and stream bank <br />instability as well as to restore environmental and aesthetic values of urban stream channels. <br />By encouraging the involvement of local agencies and citizens' groups, both paid and <br />volunteer, the DWR hopes to promote stewardship and maintenance of streams by <br /> <br />community members. <br /> <br />An urban stream restoration program can result in a variety of benefits, both to <br />individual property owners and to communities as a whole. These can be grouped into two <br />broad categories: reduction in property damages, and restoration of the natural values of the . <br />stream itself. <br />Damages to adjacent properties can be reduced by mitigating the effects of flooding, <br />erosion and stream bank instability through various restoration measures. The benefits <br />accruing to property owners are intact yards, minimal damages to trees, structures, and <br />landscaping, and healthier streamside parks. <br />Benefits of returning a stream to its more natural state are more stable stream banks, <br />restoration of the riffle-pool sequences enhancing fish habitat and other aquatic habitats, and <br />a more aesthetically pleasing ecosystem with riparian vegetation restored and wildlife habitats <br />protected. These benefits are identifiable yet difficult to quantify in dollar terms comparable <br /> <br />to the cost. Measuring homeowners' value of such benefits is important in documenting the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.