Laserfiche WebLink
<br />m <br />, <br />'" <br /> <br />III <br />U <br /><l: <br />ll. <br /> <br />lD <br />lD <br />'" <br />m <br />I5l <br />m <br />.. <br />M <br />I5l <br />M <br /> <br />" <br />C <br />~ <br /> <br />Ol <br />lli <br />U <br />Z <br />III <br />lli <br />III <br />'" <br /><l: <br />3 <br />Z <br />~ <br />..l <br />X <br />U <br />:l <br /><l: <br />..l <br />U <br />:t <br />:t <br />o <br />lli <br />1Io <br />m <br />..... <br />lD <br />~ <br /> <br />m <br />m <br />, <br />m <br />I5l <br />I <br />Z <br /><l: <br />.., <br /> <br />An Action Plan for Reducing Flood Risk in the,.. <br /> <br />Page 6 of8 <br /> <br />to the level needed to provide for immediate health, safety and welfare; and 2) limit public assistance grants to communities that elect not to <br />participate in the National Flood Insurance Program. <br /> <br />9. Federal and: state priorities should encourage relocation of flood-prone development and restoration of the natural beneficial functions of <br />lloodplainplain areas, <br /> <br />10, The federal government should continue to partner with state and local community-led efforts to develop comprehensive ftood risk <br />reduction plans using basin-wide approaches. These plans should include documentation of measures that can be taken by communities in <br />advance of an imminent flood. States that take a lead in preparing such plans should receive priority for additional assistance, <br /> <br />11. Each state should establish a task force, led by a cabinet-level oftlcial, to explore and implement methods for reducing dependence on <br />traditional federal sources of disaster recovery funding. The task force should also develop alternatives for reducing the state share of <br />disaster costs through overall Oood-Ioss reduction, enhanced building code development and enforcement, or state regulatory changes. <br /> <br />- The task force should work with federal and state agencies to make available reliable sources offunds to pursue a comprehensive flood <br />risk reduction program, <br /> <br />- Each state should consider the implementation of a "state InIst fund. to provide cost sharing for a flood risk reduction and mitigation <br />program. The trust funds could be used in the numerous instances when federal disaster assistance is unavailable, Consideration should be <br />given to establishing a mechanism to buyout properties using this fund at the lime of disa.~lers to bridge the difference between Rood <br />insurance and fair market value \0 significantly expedite the mitigation process. <br /> <br />12. The National Conference of Slate Legislatures, Council of Slale Governments, federal agencies, and the governors should continue to <br />provide information to state legislatures to advise them of the changing trends in federal disaster assistance policies and their affects on <br />state budgets. <br /> <br />IMPROVING THE COORDINATION AND COMMUNICATION 011 FLOOD ISSUES <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />Diff'erences in local and regional conditions and the evolution oftloodplainmanagement nationwide demonstrale the necessity of <br />approaching the issue from various perspectives simultaneously, However, the complexity of the nation's flood problems coupled with the <br />diftUsion of responsibility between levels of government and among agencies has resulted in uncoordinated, fragmented and inconsistent <br />approaches, Responsibility for floodplainmanagement has been hampered by uncoordinaled and conflicting federal, state and local <br />programs, This has resulted in confusion among local governments and the public, duplication of efforts, gaps in program delivery, and <br />missed opportunities all of which are magnified in the aftermath ora flood disaster. <br /> <br />. http://www.westgov.org/wgalpublicatlfldrpt.htm <br /> <br />119/98 <br />