Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br />.. <br />o <br />> <br />.. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />a: <br /> <br />- <br />u <br />. <br />a. <br />. <br />o <br />.. <br />a.. <br /> <br />. <br />o <br />. <br />ID <br /> <br />2: <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Q) <br />U <br />c: <br />C <br />+- <br />V) <br />.- <br />o <br />"'0 <br />o <br />o <br />- <br />LL <br /> <br />FIG. 6 <br /> <br />FLOOD DISTANCE VS. TRAVEL TIME <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />--.- -- -+ <br /> <br />I i <br />It- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />! ! <br />-+- -t---- <br />-++. - <br />I : <br /> <br />f- <br /> <br />- --- - f-.- <br /> <br />- -f- - <br /> <br />-+ . - -, ,- <br /> <br />- ~' __l~.'..' .'.- ~i~}' .-.. -~ ~- f-+ <br /> <br />f +., '--, --1-:'- - f- <br />-j-I- <br />'~ <br /> <br />"1 <br />-- --t-- <br />I __ --l-- <br />I II <br /> <br />+1 <br />-- --t- <br />-I <br /> <br />-I <br /> <br />I . <br /> <br />- 1.-- <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> , ~ <br /> ... <br />v "" c> <br /> J..oo I)' <br />I.... <br /> , <br />ILIO rl <br />'r~ <br /> <br />5 _ _ t~u <br />J r;- <br /> <br />R1 <br />UI <br />OD <br />o <br /> <br />-I -1--.- f'- - f---- <br />I <br /> <br />tin _d_ <br />I I <br />I <br /> <br />! . <br /> <br />! <br />, ! <br /> <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />, I <br />I I T <br /> <br />, i <br /> <br />, <br />I <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />Time (Hrs,) <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />The flood began to enter Lord Reservoir at about 1:25 p.m. on <br />Sunday. and the water level was reported to have risen initially <br />at a rate of about 10.5 inches per hour. Water began to flow <br />through the central service spillway at about 2:15 p.m.. and <br />through the emergency spillway at 3:45 p.m. The outlet works were <br />opened to increase discharge capacity. <br /> <br />At approximately 10:15 Sunday night. the rate of release from <br />Lord Reservoir equalled the rate of inflow. and the water level <br />slowly began to drop. The combined peak discharge from the three <br />release points was 1.200 cubic feet per second. based on a series <br />of water level measurements taken at the service spillway. The <br />water stopped flowing over the emergency spillway at about 10:00 <br />a.m. on Tuesday. February 12. 1980. The volume of water that <br />passed through Lord Reservoir is estimated to be approximately <br />2.230 acre-feet. <br /> <br />Flood hydrographs were developed from observations and <br />available information for the stream reaches immediately <br />downstream of both Lord and Prospect Valley Reservoirs. These <br />hydrographs are shown in Figure 4. The peak discharge from the <br />Prospect Valley Reservoir breach is estimated to be approximately <br />4,100 cfs. which occurred at about 12:00 p.m. Sunday. The flood <br />hydrograph below Lord Reservoir had an estimated peak discharge of <br />approximately 1,200 cfs. occurring at about 10:15 p.m. Sunday. <br /> <br />The flood continued below Lord Reservoir and generally <br />followed the Lost Creek channel north, toward 1-76. The peak <br />discharge had been attenuated by Lord Reservoir. The rate of tra- <br />vel in the 7-mile reach below Lord Reservoir averaged about 0.3 <br />miles per hour ( 0.4 feet per second. see Figure 5). The width of <br />the flooded area in this reach ranged from a maximum of about 3.100 <br />feet. at Weld County Road 16, to as narrow as 30 feet in the chan- <br />nel above Weld County Road 20. <br /> <br />As the flood approached 1-76. the water spread out and flowed <br />in an irregular pattern over primarily uncultivated land. The <br />