My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04742
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04742
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:07 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:55:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
312
County
Arapahoe
Community
Littleton
Stream Name
Lower Dad Clark Gulch, and DFA 0068
Basin
South Platte
Title
CWCB Review Report - 312 - FHAD - Lower Dad Clark Gulch, and DFA 0068
Date
11/1/1990
Designation Date
3/1/1991
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> Flood Control and Floodplain Management Section <br /> FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS FOR RULE 6 <br /> APPROXIMATE INFORMATION <br /> Stream name s : / <br /> V r """- <br /> 1/7 <br /> .. 'V ~ v <br /> - <br /> -", <br /> Communi ties: --- - "' <br /> Report title: --- <br /> Report date: .....- <br /> Engineer: (If different from title) <br /> Prior Designation No. (is any) "' .H"__ <br /> Does the topographic base mapping meet the minimum <br /> standard s of Rule 6.A.7 --- yes -_._- no <br />e Does the hydrologic analyses meet the minimum <br />standards of Rule 6.B.7 _._ yes -.-.-..- no <br /> Have the effects of dams been taken into account <br /> subject to the criteria of Rule 7 7 ~ yes --- no <br /> Does the hydraulic analysis meet the minimum standard s <br /> of Rule 6.C. 7 yes --.- no <br /> -.- <br /> Have the effects of levees been taken into account <br /> subject to the criteria of Rule 8 7 ~ yes ~ no <br /> Does the publi shed report and map meet the minimum <br /> standards of Rule 6.D.7 ~ yes - no <br /> Was the information developed by a quali fied individual <br /> meeting standards of Rule 6.E.7 ~ yes ~ no <br /> Reviewer's Comments: <br /> "'- <br /> RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Disapprove <br /> Reason for disapproval: -.. <br /> .. -"- <br /> Recommended by: - Date: --....., <br />e <br /> -5-.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.