My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04742
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04742
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:07 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:55:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
312
County
Arapahoe
Community
Littleton
Stream Name
Lower Dad Clark Gulch, and DFA 0068
Basin
South Platte
Title
CWCB Review Report - 312 - FHAD - Lower Dad Clark Gulch, and DFA 0068
Date
11/1/1990
Designation Date
3/1/1991
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Flood Control and Floodplain Management Section <br /> <br />FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE (Rule 11) <br /> <br />Community requesting variance: <br />Community official: <br />Date written request received by the Board: <br />Date of CWCB meeting: . <br />Affected communi ties notified in writing? <br /> <br />Rule for which variance is requested: <br /> <br />Affected communities: <br /> <br />yes <br /> <br />no <br /> <br />Reasons for requests: <br /> <br />e Estimated change in elevation: Max/Avg ft N.A. <br />Estimated ch'ange in area: Max/Avg acres N.A. <br />Estimated change in ve loci ty: Max/Avg fps N.A. <br /> Estimated number of people affected: <br /> Estimated number of structures affected: <br /> Other evidence: <br /> <br />Is there good and sufficient cause? <br />Is the request the minimum necessary? <br />Would disapproval cause a hardship? <br />Would approval increase vulnerability? <br />Would approval threaten public safety? <br />Would approval be expensive? <br />Would approval creatfl a nuisance? <br />Would approval cau~e fraud? <br />Would approval hide information? <br />Would approval conflict with any law? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION: <br />Reason for disapproval: <br />Recommended by: <br />Date: <br /> <br />._ Approve <br /> <br />Di sapprove <br /> <br />yes <br />yes <br />yes <br />yes <br />yes <br />yes <br />yes <br />yes <br />yes <br />yes <br /> <br />no <br />no <br />no <br />____no <br />_~no <br />no <br />no <br />___no <br />no <br />no <br /> <br />--14.- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.