My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04722
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04722
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:03 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:55:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Las Animas
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Storm and Flood of July2-3, 1981 Frijole Creek Basin
Date
9/1/1982
Prepared For
Colorado and Southern Railway
Prepared By
Bishop Associates, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br />t <br /> <br />several reasons. First, the headwaters of these downstream tributaries <br /> <br />generally received much less rainfall than those contributing to flow <br /> <br />. <br />above the railway bridge and, consequently, these lower tributaries <br /> <br /> <br />contributed much less to total flood volume than their drainage areas <br /> <br /> <br />alone would indicate. Second, it is unlikely the peak runoffs from all <br /> <br /> <br />or most of the lower tributaries coincided with the passage of the <br /> <br /> <br />mainstream flood peak considering the abruptness of the mainstream flood <br /> <br />peak, In such instances where the main and tributary flood peaks did <br /> <br /> <br />not closely coincide, the tributary flow adds to overall flood volume <br /> <br />but does not add significantly to the peak rate of flow. Third and most <br /> <br /> <br />important, as a result of channel storage of flood waters and of signi- <br /> <br />ficant overland flow (at low velocity) outside of the main stream <br /> <br /> <br />channel in the reach of relatively low and uniform stream gradient below <br /> <br />the railway bridge and above the USGS measuring point, the flood peak <br /> <br /> <br />was attenuated through this stream reach. Thus, the rate of flow at the <br /> <br /> <br />flood peak was less and the total flood volume was greater at the USGS <br /> <br /> <br />measuring point than at the railway bridge, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />V-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.