My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04722
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04722
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:03 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:55:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Las Animas
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Storm and Flood of July2-3, 1981 Frijole Creek Basin
Date
9/1/1982
Prepared For
Colorado and Southern Railway
Prepared By
Bishop Associates, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />contained on the south side, however, and there was considerable over- <br /> <br />bank flow with water possibly combinipg with floodwaters from the <br /> <br /> <br />adjacent San Francisco Creek basin. High water elevations on this side <br /> <br /> <br />were measured using debris trapped in sagebrush and small bushes. The <br /> <br /> <br />measurement of 48,000 cfs does not include the overbank flow component, <br /> <br />The two methods of measurement are in reasonable agreement and <br /> <br /> <br />indicate a total peak discharge near the railway bridge site of approxi- <br /> <br />mately 50,000 cfs. <br /> <br />RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH <br /> <br />The hydrograph of the flood, or time distribution of runoff, is <br /> <br />illustrated in Figure 5. The hydrograph was based on discharge compu- <br /> <br /> <br />tations described above, observations of conditions at the bridge before <br /> <br /> <br />and after the washout, and empirical runoff analyses performed using <br /> <br /> <br />U. S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) methodologies, including computer <br /> <br /> <br />modeling of the flood using the SCS TR 20 runoff hydrograph program. <br /> <br />FLOOD ATTENUATION <br /> <br />The flood discharge at the Colorado and Southern Railway bridge was <br /> <br /> <br />approximately 50,000 cfs, while at a site 8 miles downstream the dis- <br /> <br /> <br />charge was 28,400 cfs. The difference between these values is due to <br /> <br /> <br />the effect of normal flood peak attenuation during flood routing being <br /> <br /> <br />greater than the influence of the comparatively minor effect of addi- <br /> <br /> <br />tions to the flood through channels entering downstream of the railway <br /> <br />bridge. The combination of steep stream gradients abruptly decreasing a <br /> <br /> <br />short distance upstream of the railway bridge, as shown on Figure 2, and <br /> <br />intensive, short-duration rainfall concentrated in the watershed above <br /> <br /> <br />the bridge, as shown on Plate 1 and Figure 3, resulted in a flood of <br /> <br /> <br />short duration but great magnitude. The hydrograph of this flood shown <br /> <br /> <br />on Figure 5 illustrates the very rapid rise and fall of the flood wsters <br /> <br /> <br />and the peak intensity of about 50,000 cfs combined with a small total <br /> <br /> <br />flood volume (represented by the area under the hydrograph curve), <br /> <br />Downstream of the railway bridge, other tributaries enter Frijole <br />Creek and the water they carried on the night of July 2-3 added to the <br />total flood volume but did not increase the intensity of the flood for <br />V-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.