Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />III. HYDROLOGY <br /> <br />The study area was divided into seventy-seven sub-basins ranging in size from 30 acres to 145 <br /> <br /> <br />acres, The average sub-basin size is 81 acres, Figure 3 presents the sub-basin delineation, <br /> <br /> <br />Sub-basin characteristics such as area, length, and slope were measured from USGS 7,5 <br /> <br /> <br />minute quadrangle maps of Colorado for "Ralston Buttes", "Golden", "Arvada", 'Evergreen", <br /> <br /> <br />"Morrison", and "Fort Logan", <br /> <br />General <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses for Upper Lena Gulch above Maple Grove Reservoir for future conditions <br /> <br /> <br />were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Urban Drainage and Flood <br /> <br /> <br />Control District's (UDFCD) "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual" (USDCM), These analyses <br /> <br /> <br />update previous studies performed as part of the Lena Gulch Drainaae Master Plan. June 1975 <br /> <br /> <br />prepared for the UDFCD, the Cities of Golden, Lakewood and Wheat Ridge, and Jefferson <br /> <br /> <br />County, <br /> <br />Runoff hydrographs from each sub.basin for the 10, 50, and 100-year recurrence interval <br />storms were generated using CUHP, The computer program CUHPE/PC was used for actual <br />runoff computations, One-hour rainfall depths were input to CUHPE/PC as well as basin <br />characteristics such as length, length to centroid, percent impervious area, basin slope, and <br />parameters to define infiltration in the basin, CUHPE/PC used the one-hour rainfall to develop <br />a two-hour design storm, computed excess precipitation, and developed runoff hydrographs for <br />subsequent combination and routing, A detailed description of the computational procedures <br />used in CUHPE/PC may be found in the USDCM, <br /> <br />Modelina Methodoloav <br /> <br />The methodology used to analyze and quantify storm runoff has changed significantly over the <br />past 20 years, The hydrologic analyses for the 1975 Master Plan were performed using the <br />Massachusetts Institute of Technology Catchment Model computer model, also known as <br />MITCAT, and used a rainfall distribution developed from information and procedures contained <br />in the UDFCD "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual" (USDCM), The currently accepted <br />approach for computing urban runoff in the Denver area is the Colorado Urban Hydrograph <br />Procedure (CUHP) which is outlined in the current version of the USDCM, The methodology <br />presented in the USDCM is based on extensive research and practical experience in modeling <br />urban runoff in the Denver area and includes updated rainfall data derived from studies of <br />gaged precipitation records in the Denver area, <br /> <br />The basin runoff hydrographs were combined and routed to develop discharge hydrographs <br />from each basin using the UDFCD computer program UDSWM2/PC, A complete description <br />of the UDSWM2/PC program's capabilities and limitations may be found in the program's user <br />manual available from UDFCD, The UDSWM2/PC program was selected for use in routing the <br />storm hydrographs because of its ability to handle a variety of types of conveyance elements as <br />well as detention storage facilities, and because of its ease of interfacing with the CUHPE/PC <br />using runoff hydrographs as direct input Figure 4 presents a schematic diagram of the <br />hydrologic modeling structure, <br /> <br />4 <br />