Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />For sub-basins with areas less than 90 acres, the CUHP requires that the time of concentration <br /> <br /> <br />for each sub-basin be estimated, The time of concentration used as input to the CUHPE/PC <br /> <br /> <br />model was estimated using the procedures outlined in the USDCM, The computed times of <br /> <br /> <br />concentration are shown in Table 1, <br /> <br />represents an idealized section for routing computations and was estimated from the <br /> <br /> <br />topographic maps, The channel roughness coefficient was estimated from criteria outlined in <br /> <br />the USDCM, The channel routing parameters used in the model are presented in Table 3. <br /> <br />Future Basin Conditions <br /> <br />One-hour rainfall depths for the 10-, 50-, and 1 OO-year recurrence interval rainstorms were taken <br />from the USDCM depth-duration-frequency information and are summarized in Table 2 below, <br /> <br />Land use and zoning maps provided by Jefferson County and the Cities of Golden and <br /> <br /> <br />Lakewood were used to identify projected ultimate future land use in the basin, Estimates of <br /> <br /> <br />the percent impervious area for the projected land use were made and entered into the <br /> <br /> <br />hydrologic model. Peak discharges for each of the recurrence intervals were computed for <br /> <br /> <br />future basin development conditions, Figure 5 shows a map of the basin which depicts the <br /> <br /> <br />projected future land use, Table 4 contains the peak discharges for selected design points for <br /> <br /> <br />each of the recurrence intervals under future basin development <br /> <br />Table 2 <br />1-Hour Rainfall <br /> <br />Recurrence <br />Interval <br /> <br />Rainfall <br />Death (in) <br /> <br />10-yr <br />50-yr <br />100-yr <br /> <br />1.72 <br />2,35 <br />2,60 <br /> <br />TABLE 4 <br />Future Basin Conditions <br />Peak Flow Summary At Design Points (cts) <br /> <br />Channel routing parameters were developed for 54 conveyance elements from topographic <br />mapping provided by UDFCD and field inspection, These routing parameters include length of <br />conveyance element, channel bottom width, channel shape, channel invert slope, and a <br />channel roughness coefficient The channel length and invert slope were estimated from USGS <br />7,5 minute quadrangle maps, The channel geometry used in the UDSWM2/PC model <br /> <br />Location 1Q:yr QQ:yr ~ <br />Lena Gulch at Hogback 510 1,320 1,770 <br />Lena Gulch at 6th Avenue 800 1,740 2,270 <br />Lena Gulch at 1-70 1,440 3,920 3,810 <br />Inflow to Maple Grove Res, 1,580 3,080 3,980 <br /> <br />7 <br />