Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I! <br />I! <br />Ii <br />I: <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />nature and extent of FEMA involvement, (b) who should <br />attend community meetings and who should decide on <br />participation, (c) arrangements and preparation for the <br />visit, (d) documents used during the visit, (el what <br />takes place during the visit, (f) follow-up actions, and <br />(g) insurance and tender involvement. Several States <br />used FEMA Regional Office procedures with little or no <br />modification. (These procedures vary from region to <br />region). Many other States developed their own. Thus, <br />we found wide variations in the details of the <br />procedures. <br /> <br />9. State and Federal coordination of State CAPEs is <br />currently performed on an ad-hoc basis. Neither FEMA <br />nor more than a few States have prepared procedures that <br />address all of the following: (1) selecting communities <br />to be visited, (2) scheduling and reporting on visits, <br />(3) State access to FEMA docket files, and (4) <br />evaluating State performance of CAPEs. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS: FEMA and the States should adopt: <br /> <br />1. "Guidelines for CAPE Reviewers" and the "CAPE Review <br />Form" compiled from all available CAPE methodologies <br />developed to date by FEMA and the States to ensure <br />