My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04689
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04689
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:58 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:50:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
2001 Colorado Flood Documentation Report: Table of Contents and Sections 1 - 8
Date
3/1/2002
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
URS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />SEenDIFIVE <br /> <br /> <br />RiO Blanco Countv <br /> <br />5.3.1 Affected Streams and Local Drainage Areas <br /> <br />Mr. Devere indicated that most of the damages incurred in the County were roadway related, <br />Mudslides, as a result of the heavy rainfall and flash nooding, filled and covered drainage <br />ditches, culverts, and roadways with mud and other related debris, As a result, many County <br />roads were inundated and impassable by motorists, This caused many delays and problems for <br />residents in the area. Mr. Devere relayed that the Piceance Creek Basin is home to a small <br />number of petroleum related industries, and employees were either signiticantly delayed or <br />unable to get to work due to the affects of the stonns, <br /> <br />5.3,2 Inundation Limits <br /> <br />Estimated inundation extents are illustrated in Figure 5.1-2, An approximately 50-square-mile <br />area was impacted by some degree of flooding and showed signs of at least partial inundation, <br />This area includes the entire Piceance Creek Basin and portions of the White River watershed. <br />Several County roads and local streets were inundated with mud and debris as a result of tlash <br />flooding. <br /> <br />5.4 FLOOD DAMAGES <br /> <br />5,4,1 Public Property Damage <br />No damage to public property was reported, <br /> <br />5.4.2 Private Property Damage <br /> <br />Most of the private property damage was related to agriculture, Debris from the mudslides was <br />deposited on privately owned agricultural land, No reports of residential or commercial building <br />damages were obtained, and any that did occur are thought to be minimal. No private <br />expenditures related to flood damage were reported, <br /> <br />5.4.3 Emergency Response, Cleanup, and Repair <br /> <br />No Emergency flood fighting efforts were implemented. <br /> <br />The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) was contacted regarding reported damages, <br />Mr, Paul McCollum with COOT Maintenance in Craig, Colorado reported that minimal cleanup <br />activities were required as a result of mudslide debris deposits on State Route 64 just west of <br />Meeker, Mr, McCollum also reported that there were no traffic delays incurred by the debris on <br />State highways, however, drainage ditches and culverts required cleanup following the events. <br />Total CDOT expenditures for highway cleanup were estimated at $20,000, <br /> <br />Rio Blanco County sent maintenance crews to clean roads, re-shape ditches, and clean culverts <br />due to the accumulation of debris, Figure 5.1 #2 reveals all affected roadways. Costs for county <br />road cleanup have not yet been detennined at the date of this writing. <br /> <br />URS <br /> <br />T ~JEC1S'''''''lla8_CWC8-''lOOD_OOC_RPTSISV8_00l'O_PIlOJ_O€llV.REPORrviNAlREPORT I OOC12.....AR.02\\ 5-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.