Laserfiche WebLink
<br /># <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />LOCAL PREPAREDNESS AND HAZARD MITIGATION <br /> <br />Vulnerability and the rising cost of natural disaster <br />in Colorado can best be reduced by limiting settlement in <br />hazardous areas. Mitigating the costs of disaster through <br />governmental and private processes which encourage settle- <br />ment away from historically hazardous areas not only reduces <br />the chance for future catastrophe, but also generates a net <br />benefit to the taxpayer since he does not have.to spend <br />money periodically on relief and recovery. <br /> <br />When risks cannot be avoided through efforts at miti- <br />gation, preparedness to effectively respond to the onset of <br />extreme events can also red uce disaster vu1nerabil i ty and <br />cost. Preparedness depends on the ability of a community to <br />ensure that its citizens are aware of their local vulner- <br />abilities; that its ci;tizens are given and recognize <br />adequate warning of the potential onset of extreme events; <br />and that they know the safety measures, escape routes or <br />shelter that can offer protection. <br /> <br />These preparations should be incorporated in a simple, <br />easy to understand plan. The essence of preparedness is <br />then to practice, publicize and test a plan based ona given <br />hazard, so that all are confident of their operational roles <br />and responses. . <br /> <br />Just as there is a correlation between distribution <br />of population, growth and the cost of disasters, there is. <br />also a correlation between population and the ability of <br />political entities to pay for mitigation and preparedness. <br />As population increases, additional tax revenues can be made <br />available to deal with commensurately increasing' vulner- <br />ability. A growing tax base can yield increased funding for <br />preparedness. <br /> <br />The maintenance of a balance between preparedness and <br />vulnerability as growth continues will yield large net <br />benefits over the long term. Large savings will accrue if <br />citizens can be adequately warned and protected. Even <br />larger savings will accrue to the community if development <br />is managed with disaster mitigation in mind. For example, <br />if zoning is carried on effectively, people can be diverted <br />or provided incentives to avoid settling in a floodplain. <br />Thus when periodic floods occur, repeated suffering and the <br />costs of relief and recovery will not be necessary, <br /> <br />Currently, efforts are underway in Colorado to miti- <br />gate and prepare for the potential impacts of natural <br />disaster, Most flood prone communities have entered into <br />some form of floodplain management either by zoning or <br /> <br />15 <br />