Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />FEMA's reported regulatory lOO-year flood discharge for South Boulder Creek at U.S. <br />Highway 36 is noted to be 6,160 cfs as reported in the Flood Insurance Rate Study for <br />Boulder County (FIS) published in June, 1995, As previously noted, the FEMA FIS was <br />based upon he 0&0 1986 floodplain report. No new studies were performed by FEMA <br />in order to verify the data supplied in the 0&0 Report. It was at the request of Boulder <br />County and the City of Boulder that the 0&0 report was published as the regulatory <br />floodplain study for this stream, <br /> <br />The flood hydrology of South Boulder Creek utilized in the Love & Associates review <br />and analyses was obtained from the regulatory model (0&0), According to the 0&0 <br />FHAD, the hydrology of South Boulder Creek was developed by the U.S. Army Corps <br />of Engineers (USACE). <br /> <br />REVIEW OF THE GREENHORNE & O'MARA HYDRAULIC MODELS <br /> <br />A hard copy of the 0&0 regulatory HEC-2 hydraulic models of South Boulder Creek in <br />the study area was obtained from Boulder County and verified to be the same model used <br />in the FEMA FIS, The 0&0 HEC-2 models, within the study reach, consists of a main <br />channel model and a split flow model. In order to insure that the same model as used in <br />the regulatory study is the model provided to us in the 0&0 study, these models were re- <br />created and run on the PC version of HEC-2, The models and the floodplain delineation <br />shown within the FHAD were reviewed for conformance with the re-created models. <br />The Love & Associates resulting re-creation did in fact match the 0&0 and regulatory <br />HEC-2 models as published. A copy of this re-created HEC-2 regulatory model is <br />provided in the Technical Appendix of this report. <br /> <br />During the review process, inconsistencies and errors were discovered in the 0&0 <br />(regulatory) models. Flow separations modeled by 0&0 were found to be hydraulically <br />connected within portions of the study area. Additional topographic mapping was <br /> <br />-11- <br />