Laserfiche WebLink
<br />E94 <br /> <br />". <br /> <br />FLOODS OF 1965 IN THE UNITED STATES <br /> <br />". <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />..1. <br />~ 6.71 <br /> <br />12.50. Frisco City <br /> <br />5.71 <br />X <br /> <br />3.65 <br />X <br />.---- <br /> <br />I <br />~, <br />~, <br />""'\ <br />~...2 <br />) <br />/ <br />I <br /> <br />10 <br />, <br /> <br />o <br />, <br /> <br />'0 <br />, <br /> <br />6.95 <br />X <br /> <br /> <br />.,"<! <br /> <br />EXPLANATION <br />.' <br />Flood-determination point <br />Num.b6T~to <br />that in table 34 <br />X5.77 <br />~recipitation station <br />NumbeT indicatmJ pruipitati<m, in i?iCkes, <br />jortlu;periodSept.29-Oct.l,1965 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />~Of report <br /> <br />20 <br />, <br /> <br />30 MILES <br />, <br /> <br />FIGURE 45.-Location of f1.ood-determination points and precipitation sites, floods <br />of September SO-October 3 in southwestern Ala'balll1L <br /> <br />in June 1900. The Weather Bureau reported that 8,50 inches fell <br />during a 31h-hour period iu the early morning of September 30. A <br />total rainfall of 17.20 inches was recorded at the downtown station <br />during the 3-day period. <br />Other notable rainfall amounts for the 3-day period were 8,13 inches <br />at Coden, 7.36 inches at Robertsdale, 9.23 inches at Bay Minette, and <br />12.50 inches at Frisco City. Rainfall amounts for these and several <br />other locations are shown in figure 45, <br />Continuous records of rainfall were obtained by the Geological <br />Survey at two rain gages on Montlimar Creek, about 5 miles west of <br />the downtown area. Total rainfall at each station checks closely with <br />the total measured in downtown Mobile; the continuous records can <br />be used to illustrate rainfall frequency and duration for selected time <br />periods during the storm. <br /> <br />1> <br /> <br />. <br />, <br /> <br />S~RY OF FLOODS <br /> <br />E95 <br /> <br />A mass curve of rainfall for the gaging station on Montlimar Creek <br />(sta.8) at D,S, Highway 90 is shown in figure 46. ~aximum rainfall <br />amounts and intensities for selected durations durmg the storm are <br />listed in table 33, and the intensities are plotted on a rainfall inten- <br />sity-duration-frequency diagram for Mobile (fig. 47),. The 24-hour <br />rainfall of 15.9 inches greatly exceeds the 100- year ramfalL <br /> <br /> / <br /> I <br /> If <br /> / <br /> ( <br /> /' U <br />1200 1200 <br /> <br />IS <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />"' <br />~ <br />" <br />" <br />~ 12 <br />~ <br />J <br /><i! 10 <br />~ <br />z <br />'" <br />" s <br />~ <br />> <br />>= <br />"" <br />'5 6 <br />" <br />=> <br />" <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />SEPTEMBER 29 <br /> <br />SEPTEMBER 30 <br /> <br />FIGURE 46.-Accumulated rainfall for September 29-30 at Montlimar <br />Creek at U.S. Highway 90 at MObile, Ala. <br /> <br />TABLE 33.-Rainfall duration-intensitY-freq'lfency data for stO'T'1fl- of September 29-30 <br />at Montlimar Creek at U.S. H1,ghway 90 at Mob1,le, Ala. <br /> <br />Duration Mamnum Approximate <br />(minutes) Rainfall (inches) intensity reCUIT8nce <br />(inches per hour) interval (years) <br />" 1.1 M 2 <br />30 1.8 3.8 4 <br />80 3.1 3.1 15 <br />120 U 2,0 20 <br />180 6.3 2.1 1_ <br />1,440 15.9 ,68 100+ <br /> <br />j. <br />