Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Of note is that the peak flows under existing conditions <br />indicate that the road embankment at Bradley Road and the <br />spi llway on detention pond #5 would be overtopped in a lOO-year <br />storm. The RBD and SLA hydrology showed that the ponds would <br />contain the 100-year flows. This has significant impact on the <br />culverts and channels that were recently constructed since they <br />were designed to contain the 100-year flows and elIminate <br />Inundation of new development. <br /> <br /> <br />13.0 JIMMY CAMP TRIBUTARY HYDROLOGY <br /> <br />13 .1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />13.2 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Watershed Description <br /> <br />The watershed for Jimmy Camp TrIbutary (JCT) is located <br />southeast of Widefield to the north and west of Marksheffel <br />Road. The headwaters of the drainage are east of BIg Johnson <br />Reservoir and north of Fontaine Boulevard. This tributary has <br />been named the FontaIne Tributary in the 1987 Jimmy Camo Creek <br />!:laster jJralnage Plannil]g Study (Reference 31). The location is <br />more spE!cificaIly shown on Figure 13.1. <br /> <br />The watershed is currently undeveloped for the most part, with <br />a small amount of development occurring southeast of <br />MarksheEfel Road and along Fontaine Boulevard. The watershed <br />consists primarIly of rolling terrain with rangeland slopes <br />varyIng from less than 1% to over 4%. There are several small <br />stock p,'nds in the basIn, but for the most part the channel is <br />relatively undefined, particularly In the area where it crosses <br />Marksheffel Road just upstream of the confluence with Jimmy <br />Camp Creek. Soils In the basin are classified as mostly type <br />llBl1 and I'C'I with moderate infiltration rates. <br /> <br />PrevIous studies include the FTS. -=- El Paso County (Reference <br />19), thE! Flood Hazard Analvses -=- PortIons of Jimmy Camo Creek <br />~Dd TrIhllt~ries by the SCS (Reference 32) and the JImmy Camp <br />Creek !:!,aster Dralna~ planning, Study by Wilson and Co. <br />(Reference 31). <br /> <br />This tributary has never been studied for floodplain mapping <br />purposes and the only detailed analysis was completed as part <br />of the master drainage planning study. <br /> <br />Previous Studies <br /> <br />A comparison of flows from the previous studies is provided in <br />Table 13.1. The detai.ls of the 1975 hydrologic analysis are <br />not available, although the total 100-year discharge at the <br />lower end of the study on Jimmy Camp Creek immediately <br />upstream of this tributary was estimated to be 14,500 cfs. <br /> <br />In 1976, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers studied the lower <br />portions of the Jimmy Camp Creek watershed (Reference 10) and <br /> <br />56 <br /> <br />R€~OURC€ CON~UlTI\NT~ INC <br />